Although President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) deserves recognition for his ostensible desire to address government corruption, his recent proposal to establish an anti-corruption commission was more talk than action, analysts said.
Ma announced on July 20 that it was necessary to establish a commission against corruption following a recent series of corruption cases, including a scandal involving judges.
Ma said the commission would be established under the Ministry of Justice, rather than being independent. Taiwan would not copy the approach of Hong Kong or Singapore, where the units were established under the chief executive or prime minister, Ma said, adding that its unique feature would be to specialize in fighting graft.
Ma’s decision was an apparent policy U-turn as his party blocked a similar proposal more than 170 times in the legislature when the Democratic Progressive Party was in power.
Ma said he made the decision for three reasons. First was the need to buttress government efforts to combat corruption; second was public expectations; and third was the need to conform to international standards.
Judicial Reform Foundation executive director Kao Yung-cheng (高涌誠) said no one would oppose combating corruption, but Ma’s proposal was more a political gesture.
“It is politically motivated and aims to boost the KMT’s [Chinese Nationalist Party] momentum in the November elections,” he said.
Realizing the corruption scandal involving High Court judges dealt a significant blow to judicial credibility, Kao said, Ma knows he must act quickly lest the public lose its trust in the judiciary and police.
Kao said Ma’s political gesture was understandable, but what he intended to do was not enough.
If Ma was serious about rooting out graft, Kao said he should have either expanded the Special Investigation Panel (SIP) under the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, or place the proposed anti-corruption commission under the SIP.
Ma should also consider establishing the unit under the Presidential Office or the Executive Yuan, he said.
“What really matters is whether the president is determined to combat graft,” he said. “I personally don’t think he is because he is reluctant to change the government structure to accommodate the new commission.”
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has ruled out the possibility of setting up the proposed unit under the Presidential Office or Executive Yuan, saying it was “constitutionally unfeasible.” He said the “current conditions” were not right for amending the Constitution or Cabinet organizational rules to establish the planned commission as an independent body.
Aside from establishing the unit, Kao said there were two things the administration should do. First is that the administration must consider lightening the sentence for graft so judges are more inclined to convict more corrupt civil servants.
As the law stands, public servants found guilty of embezzling more than NT$50,000 (US$1,560) are subject to a minimum sentence of 10 years and can be fined up to NT$100 million, under the Anti-Corruption Act (貪汙治罪條例).
“It’s harsher than the 10 or 12-year sentence for killing someone,” he said. “An effective piece of legislation is more important than a stringent one.”
The second is that the administration must consider abolishing Article 6 of the act, which Kao said had a very vague definition of the civil servants’ “desire to make profit.” Not only were few public servants were convicted of corruption under this provision, but the clause also encouraged them to be passive on the job, Kao said.
Lin Ming-hsin (林明昕), a law professor at National Taiwan University, said it was unnecessary to establish an anti-corruption commission because many government agencies are in charge of combating graft. They included the government ethics department, the Investigation Bureau, district courts and Control Yuan, he said.
“Now they want to add another one,” he said. “I wonder how much more effective it would be than the existing agencies. I also want to know who would investigate corrupt anti-corruption commission members.”
Lin said since the proposed commission was unnecessary, he did not think it mattered whether it should be established as an independent body and answer only to the president or premier.
Lin said he realized Hong Kong’s Independent Commission Against Corruption was established under the chief executive and Singapore’s Anti-Corruption Bureau under the prime minister.
“But Singapore also had caning, do we also want it here?” he asked. “If we fear that the new commission would become an ungovernable beast, it might be a better idea to set it up as a toothless tiger.”
Lin, however, declined to connect the anti-corruption commission with the November elections, saying elections were frequent in Taiwan.
Max Huang (黃國昌), an assistant research fellow of law at Academia Sinica, said Ma’s proposal was nothing but a show aimed at deflecting public pressure.
“He totally missed the mark,” Huang said. “Fighting corruption is just part of the judicial reform and corrupt judges are merely one of the many problems of the judiciary.”
If Ma was serious about judicial reform, Huang said Ma should have looked at the bigger picture, identified the problems and “suited the remedy to the disease.”
Huang said among the fundamental problems of the judiciary was the recruitment of judges, adding that it was “stupid” to select them through examinations. While it would make more sense to hire outstanding lawmakers, prosecutors or law professors to be judges, Huang said judges must be civil servants.
“What we end up with is a bunch of college graduates who are good at memorizing and passing exams, but what we really need is someone who has social and practical legal experience,” he said. “Men who are still wet behind the ears preside over a criminal court to give out a life-or-death sentence.”
Huang lamented the stagnation of judicial reform, saying the employment of judges remained unchanged over the past decade in the wake of the 1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform.
Huang said the head of the Judicial Yuan and Ma should be held responsible for the delay of judicial reform. Although they appeared to have the desire to push reform, their words speak louder than their actions, he said.
As Ma has called for the passage of a law for judges, Huang said he suspected the legislature would approve the bill, but he would like to see how the law was enacted and whether Ma was serious about passing the law this time around.
Huang said that while he did not expect the selection process for judges to change any time soon, he would like to see the judges’ law require that outside representatives sit on the personnel committee and offer incentives to non-public servants to become judges.
The transfer and promotion of judges should be fair and open, he said, although he did not think promotion should exist at all because all judges should deem their job as a sacred mission.
Bad judges should be weeded out, Huang said. He has seen judges showing up late and being impatient or even mean to prosecutors or the accused, he said, but only a few judges were disciplined for any misconduct during the past decade.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods