The Consumer Protection Commission yesterday released a list of preserved milk products currently on sale that have not been properly labeled, saying the error could result in them being confused for fresh milk.
The commission recently conducted inspections on preserved milk products, also known as ultra- high temperature (UHT) processed milk, and found that 11 types manufactured by three well-known producers had been labeled in a way that could mislead shoppers.
Various preserved, flavored and high-calcium milk products processed by Kuang Chuan Dairy Co (光泉牛乳), Fresh Delight Taiwan (福樂鮮乳) and Taiwan Provincial Farmers’ Association (台農乳品) carried no label identifying them as preserved milk on the front of their packaging, commission section chief Wu Cheng-hsueh (吳政學) said.
PHOTO: CNA
The consumer ombudsman began its investigation after receiving a complaint from a confused consumer.
“Many producers indicate the percentage of fresh milk contained and include a list of ingredients in small print on the side of the package, but they do not write ‘flavored milk’ or ‘preserved milk’ on the front of the package ... Consumers may be misled into thinking a products is pure, fresh milk because it is refrigerated,” Wu said.
The most important difference between fresh and preserved milk is that bacteria is killed during the UHT treatment process, so preserved milk typically has a shelf life of about six months, while fresh milk lasts only about 14 days before it spoils. Fresh milk and preserved milk have a similar nutritious value, but fresh milk is typically higher priced.
Confronted with this revelation, producers informed the commission that as there was no difference in the quality of the milk it did not constitute an attempt to mislead consumers.
They did, however, promise to upgrade their labeling within the next few months.
The Department of Health’s Food and Drug Administration yesterday urged producers to clearly distinguish between fresh and preserved milk on labeling and packaging or face fines of up to NT$150,000 for violation of the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法).
In related news, the Consumers’ Foundation yesterday said that one out of every six plastic kitchen gloves sold in Taiwan contains too much plasticizer, which can cause health problems, especially for pregnant women.
The consumer rights watchdog recently conducted inspections on 12 types of widely available kitchen glove and found that two products, manufactured by Haw-ping Corp (豪品國際實業) and RT-Mart (大潤發), contained over 0.1 percent of phthalate plasticizer, the maximum allowed under Chinese National Standard 3478 for plastic shoes. The foundation used that standard as a proxy for kitchen gloves because there is currently no standard for gloves in Taiwan.
Exposure to phthalate plasticizer, also known as environmental hormones, can disrupt a person’s endocrine system causing a higher risk of breast cancer or endometrial cancer (cancer of the lining of the uterus), Consumers’ Foundation committee member and dermatologist Chan Heng-leong (曾興隆) said.
Responding to the foundation’s claims, Haw-ping and RT-Mart said their products did not pose a health risk and were in accordance with product safety standards.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods