The Consumers’ Foundation yesterday went to the Department of Health (DOH) to protest the government’s decision to allow imports of cow tongues and diaphragms from the US, while the DOH denied that politics was involved in opening the country to US beef and its policy backtrack in the past two days.
The foundation, which has been pushing for a referendum on the beef import issue, said that cow tongues, diaphragms and other parts should be considered internal organs and therefore prohibited from import.
On Monday, officials from the DOH, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Council of Agriculture (COA) told a press conference that tongues, penises, testes, tails, tendons and skirts (diaphragms) derived from cattle less than 30 months of age slaughtered on or after April 1 would be permitted to enter the country because they are not internal organs and therefore meet the requirements set by the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法).
PHOTO: LO PEI-DER, TAIPEI TIMES
The Act, passed on Jan. 5, prohibits the import of US ground beef, beef offal and other parts, such as the skull, eyes and intestines, contravening a bilateral protocol signed by Taiwan and the US in October last year.
On Tuesday, however, officials held another press conference and advised businesses to hold off on importing cow tongues, testes, tendons and skirts because of consumer concern that these parts may expose them to the risk of contracting bovine spongiform encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease.
“The attempt to push cow tongues and diaphragms into the country was the US government’s way of testing the waters to see how consumers would react,” said Foundation chairman Hsieh Tien-jen (謝天仁), who said politics was behind the decision.
“The US is pushing the boundaries on which parts can be imported to Taiwan. Eventually, the entire cow will be allowed with no limitations on the cattle’s age,” he said.
The foundation urged government officials to set clear prohibitive measures on imports of any kind of meat that may pose health risks to the public, rather than being indecisive and allowing imports while advising companies to refrain from importing the products.
In the past few days, the foundation’s criticism of the DOH and other government agencies has been joined by lawmakers, civic groups and academics alike, who disapprove of the government’s on-again, off-again stance.
In response, the DOH denied that politics was involved or that it has backtracked on its own policies by saying that it has maintained a consistent position, which is that cow tongues, diaphragms and testicles are not internal organs and are permitted to enter the country. However, in order to assuage consumers’ concerns about the safety of the beef parts, the DOH “advised” businesses to hold off on importing the beef parts until the issues can be resolved.
Meanwhile, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) also denied that the government had performed a U-turn on tongue imports.
In an interview with the CtiTV last night, Wu defended the Bureau of Foreign Trade (BOFT).
“The BOFT did not do anything wrong, neither did the DOH — [the government] did not sway back and forth. On the contrary, I thought [the DOH] did well to ensure the public’s health,” Wu said.
Wu said that the BOFT made the decision in accordance with the conclusions of a panel of experts on May 18 last year that cow tongues and the other 12 items were classified as offal and not internal organs.
He did not elaborate on what prompted the BOFT to make the promulgation on April 1st since the entry ban on US bone-in beef and other beef products, including cow tongue and other offal, has been lifted since the signing of the Taiwan-US beef protocol last October.
“Now that consumers, academics and professors and National Taiwan University zoology professors have expressed concerns over the safety of cow tongues, the DOH did a good job in halting the imports,” Wu said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods