Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) on March 24 announced a plan to draft an ethnic equality act amid uproar caused by former Toronto-based Government Information Office staffer Kuo Kuan-ying’s (郭冠英) articles defaming Taiwan and Taiwanese.
However, analysts disagree on whether such legislation would be necessary.
Shih Cheng-feng (施正峰), dean of the College of Indigenous Studies at National Dong Hwa University, said such an act would be significant even though it would be impossible for the act to root out discrimination in the country.
“At least such an act would be able to curb provocative remarks,” Shih said, adding that countries in the West had enacted similar laws in the 1970s and 1980s.
Shih said the proposed legislation should clearly list behavior considered discriminatory, although he said it would be difficult to detail every potential discriminatory act. He also supported introducing severe criminal punishment in the act, saying it would be the most effective way to sanction those who discriminate against people from different ethnic backgrounds.
Chiou Chang-tay (丘昌泰), a professor at the Department of Public Administration and Policy at National Taipei University, disagreed, saying that legislation should be “the last resort” in attempts to curb discrimination.
“We are too confident that enacting a law would be the solution to everything,” said Chiou, former chairman of the Graduate Institute of Hakka Politics and Economics at National Central University. “Many countries rely on moral education instead [when pursuing ethnic harmony] ... Respecting each other should be a very basic everyday attitude.”
Chiou said that including more ethnic education in the elementary school curriculum would be a more suitable approach.
Legislative records show that the idea of an ethnic equality act was first proposed by then-Taiwan Solidarity Union legislator Lo Chih-ming (羅志明) and eight other lawmakers across party lines on April 2, 2003, in a bid to reinforce the Constitution’s anti-discrimination spirit and promote ethnic harmony.
However, the bill did not clear the legislative floor because lawmakers failed to reach a consensus on the proposal.
Different versions of an ethnic equality act were proposed by caucuses during the next few sessions, but none of them were approved by the legislature.
On Sept. 22, 2004, then-People First Party legislators Lin Cheng-yi (林政義) and Shen Chih-hwei (沈智慧) proposed an anti-ethnic discrimination act that sought to punish anyone who discriminated against a specific ethnic group with hostile, humiliating, offensive or threatening language, pictures or behavior to a maximum of five years in prison and/or a maximum fine of NT$500,000 (US$15,000). However, the legislature also failed to pass this bill before the end of the fall legislative session in 2004.
An ethnic equality act proposed by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and six other KMT legislators on Oct. 22 last year is currently awaiting preliminary review by the Internal Administration Committee.
The proposal defines an ethnic community as a group or community that is aware that they have a different history, origin, culture and living environment from other groups.
It defines discrimination as any act of exclusion, harassment, restriction or preferential treatment based on ethnic differences that is intended to or that results in hurting or eliminating political, economic, social, cultural or civil rights.
The bill proposes that different government branches establish their own ethnic equality committees composed of academics and experts from different ethnic groups and authorize the committees to investigate allegations of racial discrimination.
The bill stipulates that anyone has the right to request an end to and compensation for discriminatory language, news reports, advertisements, political talk show content or any other form of intentional discrimination.
Unlike previous proposals, the bill introduces a two-year jail term or a NT$1,000 fine for those who “fuel discrimination.”
Although Liu had indicated his determination to push through the bill, Chiou said he was concerned whether the government would be able to actually carry out the proposed regulations.
“First of all, it would be difficult for people investigating a racial discrimination case to reach a consensus because of their different ethnic backgrounds,” Chiou said.
Without thorough planning, the proposal could end up being almost impossible to carry out, like the Political Donation Act (政治獻金法) or the Lobby Act (遊說法), Chiou said.
Association of Mainlander Taiwanese chief executive Huang Luo-fei (黃洛斐) voiced similar views.
“There are many historical and cultural factors behind the problem of ethnic inequality [in Taiwan]. It would be difficult to resolve ethnic issues by enacting a law,” Huang said.
She said that it would be tough to draw boundaries between different ethnic groups and that she favored an anti-discrimination act aimed at tackling discrimination based on factors such as gender.
She was also concerned about the KMT’s proposed punishment for those who “fuel discrimination” as it remained unclear in the bill what constituted the provocation of discrimination.
“For example, the language [used by politicians] to mobilize supporters of a certain ethnic community to vote for them ... Should it be considered discrimination?” she said.
“There could be controversy regarding what remarks or behavior should be considered discriminatory because it involves the second party’s feelings,” she said.
Huang was also against the KMT’s proposal that would allow different government branches to set up their own ethnic equality committees.
The government should integrate the functions and power of the committees and establish a national human rights commission, she said.
“The government should not hastily enact the law in response to Kuo’s case ... [without proper legislation], as we might see a lot of ethnic lawsuits and this would not help ensure peace between different ethnic communities [in Taiwan],” she said.
The Taipei Department of Health yesterday said it has launched a probe into a restaurant at Far Eastern Sogo Xinyi A13 Department Store after a customer died of suspected food poisoning. A preliminary investigation on Sunday found missing employee health status reports and unsanitary kitchen utensils at Polam Kopitiam (寶林茶室) in the department store’s basement food court, the department said. No direct relationship between the food poisoning death and the restaurant was established, as no food from the day of the incident was available for testing and no other customers had reported health complaints, it said, adding that the investigation is ongoing. Later
REVENGE TRAVEL: A surge in ticket prices should ease this year, but inflation would likely keep tickets at a higher price than before the pandemic Scoot is to offer six additional flights between Singapore and Northeast Asia, with all routes transiting Taipei from April 1, as the budget airline continues to resume operations that were paused during the COVID-19 pandemic, a Scoot official said on Thursday. Vice president of sales Lee Yong Sin (李榮新) said at a gathering with reporters in Taipei that the number of flights from Singapore to Japan and South Korea with a stop in Taiwan would increase from 15 to 21 each week. That change means the number of the Singapore-Taiwan-Tokyo flights per week would increase from seven to 12, while Singapore-Taiwan-Seoul
POOR PREPARATION: Cultures can form on food that is out of refrigeration for too long and cooking does not reliably neutralize their toxins, an epidemiologist said Medical professionals yesterday said that suspected food poisoning deaths revolving around a restaurant at Far Eastern Department Store Xinyi A13 Store in Taipei could have been caused by one of several types of bacterium. Ho Mei-shang (何美鄉), an epidemiologist at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Biomedical Sciences, wrote on Facebook that the death of a 39-year-old customer of the restaurant suggests the toxin involved was either “highly potent or present in massive large quantities.” People who ate at the restaurant showed symptoms within hours of consuming the food, suggesting that the poisoning resulted from contamination by a toxin and not infection of the
BAD NEIGHBORS: China took fourth place among countries spreading disinformation, with Hong Kong being used as a hub to spread propaganda, a V-Dem study found Taiwan has been rated as the country most affected by disinformation for the 11th consecutive year in a study by the global research project Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem). The nation continues to be a target of disinformation originating from China, and Hong Kong is increasingly being used as a base from which to disseminate that disinformation, the report said. After Taiwan, Latvia and Palestine ranked second and third respectively, while Nicaragua, North Korea, Venezuela and China, in that order, were the countries that spread the most disinformation, the report said. Each country listed in the report was given a score,