|
Environmentalists decry Alishan train plan
CONTROVERSY:
Plans to save NT$200 million annually by privatizing the train drew complaints from critics who called the project destructive, illegal and unsafe
By Meggie Lu
STAFF REPORTER
Tuesday, Jun 17, 2008, Page 2
Starting on Thursday, the ownership and operation of the Alishan (ªü¨½¤s) mountain train will be transferred to a privately owned enterprise in a "three-in-one" Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) project that will last 33 years, relieving the government of a NT$200 million (US$6.6 million) annual loss the train incurs.
However, a group of environmentalists yesterday lambasted the Council of Agriculture¡¦s Forestry Bureau, saying that with inexperienced drivers manning the trains, the government is disregarding the safety and lives of tourists.
¡§The Alishan Railway is one of three high altitude railways in the world, and drivers apprentice for years before they can safely operate the trains,¡¨ said Lynn Lin (ªL¤lâ), secretary-general of the Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association.
But of the 50 drivers in Hung-du Alishan International Development Corp¡¦s (HAIDC) lineup, only nine experienced drivers will be transferred from the bureau, while others will be novices, Lin said.
Even under management of the bureau, a derailment killed 17 people in 2003, leaving 171 more injured, Lin said.
From March to last month, four additional derailments occurred, Lin said, adding that although no one was seriously injured, it showed that track maintenance and driver skills were of paramount importance.
Lin said the mountain train was not the only cause of concern.
¡§The government offered the company lucrative incentives to take over the money-losing trains ¡X the rights to build two hotels, one atop Alishan and another at the foot of the mountain next to the station where people board the trains,¡¨ she said.
To build the hotel atop Alishan, between 300 and 400 old trees will be chopped down, Lin said, not to mention the added damage more tourists would bring.
¡§And since the hotel has yet to pass its Environmental Impact Assessment [EIA], by transferring the project to a developer, the bureau is breaching the EIA law, which prohibits acts of development before a project passes its EIA,¡¨ she said.
In addition to environmentalists, the Alishan community is also ¡§appalled¡¨ at the idea of a hotel in their neighborhood, Alishan Community Development Association chairman Liao Jing-tai (¹ù´º®õ) said.
¡§When tourists come to Alishan, we want them to see it in its natural condition ¡X not with its trees chopped down,¡¨ Liao said.
Liao also said the government was employing a double standard.
¡§While the Alishan people ¡X mostly descendants of lumber workers whose families have lived here for almost 100 years ¡X were removed from that section of Alishan in 1966 by the government and told that no one could inhabit the place anymore, a hotel will now be built there,¡¨ Liao said.
In response to the accusations, Forestry Bureau Deputy Director-General Lee Tao-sheng (§õ®ç¥Í) said the safety of the trains under HAIDC would be the same as it is now, and the transfer decision was economically sound.
¡§Nine experienced drivers will go from the bureau to HAIDC, which is sufficient to cover the current train schedule, at one train on weekdays and two during weekends,¡¨ Lee said.
In addition to the drivers, 55 other bureau employees, including maintenance technicians, will serve the company, Lee said.
¡§The particular piece of property had been designated for hotel usage since 1966 ¡X pending the agreement of the Cabinet. Now, the Cabinet has given the project a green light,¡¨ he said.
¡§BOT transfers of governmental projects is an international trend. In addition to the NT$900 million rent the government will collect in the 33 years, NT$1.06 billion in train-related expenditure can be saved, which, compared with a NT$200 million annual loss, saves a lot of tax dollars,¡¨ Lee said.
This story has been viewed 1017 times.
|
Advertising


|