Analysis: Expense fund controversy just part of transitional justice, legal experts say - Taipei Times
Thu, Nov 30, 2006 - Page 3 News List

Analysis: Expense fund controversy just part of transitional justice, legal experts say

ONE STANDARD FOR ALL When the government pursues people suspected of tax evasion, it doesn't make sense to let corrupt local chiefs off the hook

By Ko Shu-ling  /  STAFF REPORTER

Amid concerns that judicial wrangling may escalate into a political storm, proposals have been made to resolve the controversies involving the president's "state affairs fund" and the Taipei mayoral special allowance through political means.

While President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who has been accused of graft, forgery and perjury in connection with the handling of Chen's "state affairs fund," could not be charged because of his presidential immunity, first lady Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍) was indicted earlier this month on a similar range of charges. Prosecutors have also questioned Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) for the alleged mishandling of his special allowance fund.

In response to these events, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Yeh Yi-chin (葉宜津) recently proposed a special law to grant amnesty to local chiefs found guilty of misusing their special allowance funds. She later withdrew her suggestion.

KMT and People First Party lawmakers have also advocated reforming the special allowance fund system through enactment of a special law to stipulate clear-cut regulations for the use of expense budgets by government officials.

With Judicial Yuan President Weng Yueh-Sheng (翁岳生), State Public Prosecutor-General Wu Ying-chao (吳英昭) and Taiwan High Court Prosecutor-General Hsieh Wen-ting (謝文定) also being accused of misusing their special expense funds, some prosecutors have proposed that the Prosecutor's Association call a meeting to solicit opinions on how to handle the matter with uniform standards.

Y.C. Kao (高湧誠), executive director of the Judicial Reform Foundation, said there was nothing wrong with Yeh's proposal and others like it, but was against the idea of resolving the problem with political means.

"You can't simply paint the sky black to hide the crows," he said. "The public cannot pretend that nothing happened because all local chiefs embezzled money from their special funds."

When the government pursues civilians suspected of tax evasion or forgery with considerable enthusiasm, it doesn't make sense for the judicial system to let corrupt local chiefs off the hook, Kao said.

Instead of resorting to political means, Kao said the judicial system must get to the bottom of the matter.

"I'm not saying that they should all be convicted or go to jail, but the people have the right to know why so many government officials dare to pocket public funds and how the wrongdoing could be corrected and the system improved," he said.

The judge could lessen the sentence if the defendant can produce "appropriate reasons" to justify their illegal activities, Kao said, but the defendant cannot be exempted from any criminal responsibility just because he or she claimed ignorance of the law.

Kao said he believed Chen and Ma were not corrupt politicians but it was wrong to pocket public funds.

Kao said he thought it was a bad idea to enact a special retrospective law to resolve the controversy, but if the legislature or politicians insisted on doing so, they would have to brace themselves for the political consequences.

Allen Houng (洪裕宏), an executive member of the Taipei Society, agreed with Kao that Chen and Ma might not be corrupt, but suggested it might be a good idea to lock up all of the nation's corrupt political elites -- this way new blood could be introduced to the political arena.

This story has been viewed 3227 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top