The president's decision not to issue a rebuttal to the recall motion sparked a hot debate among legislators yesterday.
Pan-blue legislators accused the president of defying public opinion represented by the legislature, as the recall proposal was passed by a clear majority of the special legislative session running from Tuesday to June 30.
"I thought the president refused because he was afraid of facing the scandals involved his families and aides," said Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Pan Wei-kang (
PHOTO: LIAO CHENG-HUEI, TAIPEI TIMES
"Apparently he must have nothing to say in reply," Pan said.
On Tuesday, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) issued an official document to inform President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the legislature's intention to recall him.
The motion was put on agenda with 113 affirmative votes to 96 dissenting.
Chen can respond to the recall proposal before June 20.
People First Party (PFP) caucus whip Lu Hsueh-chang (
"Chen's refusal to respond means that he implicitly admits the legitimacy of the recall proposal. He is trying to show that the recall proposal can't harm him at all," Lee said.
Starting today, the KMT and PFP caucuses will hold at least seven hearings to examine recent scandals related to the first family and the president's aides.
Some of the accusations are targeted at first lady Wu Shu-jen (
Elsewhere, the president was charged with mishandling cross-strait relations and the economy. There are a total of 10 charges.
The pan-blues have been encouraging all those involved to attend the hearings.
"Through the course of the hearings, we want to let people know that recalling the president is their basic right," Lu said.
"The president's personal violation of the law is not a precondition for the people to exercise this right," he said.
The pan-greens, on the other hand, are considering boycotting the legislature's four-day review, which has been slated for next Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and the following Monday, June 26.
"We might decline to attend the legislature's review meetings for the recall," said Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (
DPP caucus members are divided over how to react to the pan-blues' recall campaign -- as are other members of the pan-green camp.
Some are keen to face the recall process, while others say the DPP should just ignore it.
Ker said the KMT and the PFP did not originally plan to call a special legislative session but changed their minds once the recall plan was launched.
"We think the recall motion is only a by-product of the contention between PFP Chairman James Soong (
He said it was Soong who insisted on the recall motion.
KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
However, Ma later found that Soong's recall gambit might threaten Hau's election prospects, so he changed his mind, Ker said.
"Ma, who is the pan-blue camp's presidential hopeful, is so irresponsible and has no political judgment," Ker said.
"I can only say that he is a a stupid political hack, who simply follows the PFP's lead," Ker said.
DPP caucus whip Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) said many grassroots supporters are angry at the pan-blue camp's politicking and she personally hoped that the Presidential Office would respond to the recall motion.
But Yeh emphasized that the recall was simply a political tool of the pan-blue opposition.
She said there is no evidence to substantiate that the president and the first lady are involved in any wrongdoing.
"The president is unable to and has no need to respond to those groundless charges," she said.
Meanwhile, Taiwan Solidarity Union caucus whip David Huang (
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) mention of Taiwan’s official name during a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Wednesday was likely a deliberate political play, academics said. “As I see it, it was intentional,” National Chengchi University Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies professor Wang Hsin-hsien (王信賢) said of Ma’s initial use of the “Republic of China” (ROC) to refer to the wider concept of “the Chinese nation.” Ma quickly corrected himself, and his office later described his use of the two similar-sounding yet politically distinct terms as “purely a gaffe.” Given Ma was reading from a script, the supposed slipup
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
The bodies of two individuals were recovered and three additional bodies were discovered on the Shakadang Trail (砂卡礑) in Taroko National Park, eight days after the devastating earthquake in Hualien County, search-and-rescue personnel said. The rescuers reported that they retrieved the bodies of a man and a girl, suspected to be the father and daughter from the Yu (游) family, 500m from the entrance of the trail on Wednesday. The rescue team added that despite the discovery of the two bodies on Friday last week, they had been unable to retrieve them until Wednesday due to the heavy equipment needed to lift