Taipei Times: Since the success of the Feb. 28, 2004 hand-in-hand rally that championed Taiwan's sovereignty and rejected China's missile threat, the Taiwan independence movement seems to have been unable to move forward. Do you think the movement has suffered any setbacks?
Yao Chia-wen (
The first stage was before 1971, a period during which we focused on advocating Taiwan's separation from China because the government ruled by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) claimed it was a regime that represented China, with the official name of the Republic of China (ROC) only. Therefore, many independence campaigners overseas at that time argued that Taiwan should separate from China and announce its independence.
PHOTO: WU WEI-GUNG, TAIPEI TIMES
The second stage was from 1971 to 1986, the year that the DPP was founded. During this period, the Kaohsiung Incident (美麗島事件) occurred in 1979, former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) passed away and former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) succeeded him. What we worked on during this period was trying to rid Taiwan of the color of China or China's influence and trying to change Taiwan from a "Chinese nationality" into a "Taiwanese nationality." In practical ways, we facilitated full-scale elections for the legislature and promoted the direct election of the president.
The third stage of the Taiwan independence movement started in 1986 and is still ongoing. We are now in the latter period of the third stage. What we [the DPP] have tried to highlight and restate during this period is that Taiwan enjoys independent sovereignty. In that regard, we proposed a Constitution for the Republic of Taiwan in 1990. And then Lee announced the abolition of the "Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion" (動員戡亂條款) and enabled people to vote directly for the president and vice president.
With the subsequent chain of democratic reforms, Taiwan has confirmed the fact that its territory covers Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu. Since then, the DPP has stopped championing separation and moved to highlighting Taiwan's status quo, which indicates that Taiwan is an independent sovereign state with a democratic system.
After that, Lee proposed his "special state-to-state" theory (
What independence campaigners are doing now is to promote something that will enable Taiwan to become a state that has a name and constitution matching the present reality and its people's needs. I think the Taiwan independence movement moves forward slowly but you can't say it has been dealt any setbacks.
However, we do face some difficulties in revising the Constitution and promoting the name-change movement because the opposition parties control the legislature. Besides, I think the DPP has not disseminated enough information regarding the independence movement. But that's another issue.
What Taiwan does now is to fight against China's rule and refuse to become a part of the People's Republic of China (PRC). In this regard, it also means that Taiwan has never been a part of the PRC.
So far, we've made some initial achievements regarding the name-change movement, for example, the word "Taiwan" has been added to Taiwanese passports.
However, there are still many government departments and social groups using the word "China," such as state-run China Steel (
As for writing a constitution, it is true that we face some hitches and difficulties. In Taiwan, there are still many people who are reluctant to wipe away China's influence. But I have to say that it was not wise for the president to claim that "Taiwan is the ROC and the ROC is Taiwan" as he did in his 2004 National Day address, because that does not reflect the reality.
Taipei Times: Do you think the issue of constitutional reforms and the name-change movement are overused by leading figures in the DPP at election time? It seems that leaders like the president often bring up these issues to stimulate voters' will, yet remain oblivious of their campaign promises after the election campaigns end.
Yao: The president did not participate in the independence movement from the very beginning; therefore, he might not exactly understand how we got through it and what we have achieved over the years.
Taipei Times: I talked to people who participated in the march held on Sept. 25 to protest against the pan-blue opposition's ongoing obstruction of the special arms budget. Many of them felt that the independence movement has lost its energy since the DPP won power. What exactly is the problem?
Yao: Well, I have to say that the DPP now lacks a complete discourse for the independence movement. But that is only one of the problems. The DPP's organization is not strong enough either. The campaigning style should be changed too.
For example, from my observations, the constitutional task force established by the Presidential Office is weak and doesn't function effectively. Gathering academics and governmental officials to discuss constitutional topics in luxurious meeting rooms in hotels doesn't really help.
I think the biggest reason for the current inactivity of the Taiwan independence movement is the negligence of political leaders. It seems that leaders of social groups, political parties and governmental departments have more interest in campaigning for public office than in the campaign for reforms.
Some people holding important office who have power and influence either have no time or have no interest in [promoting the independence movement.]
Therefore, reforms are consequently stalled. Besides, Taiwan's mass media is also a strong reactionary force in blocking the reform movement. But the obstruction that we encounter is no less than that during the era of martial law.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods