The Ministry of Education's (MOE) decision this month to first ban public-school restrictions on permissible hairstyles and later lift those on shoes and socks for secondary-school students, sparked debate on whether students should be given total freedom over their appearance.
While many schools hesitated to carry out the new policy, the lifting of the hair and dress regulations has officially put an end to an outdated era and granted students the right to determine their own hairstyles and appearance.
Looking back at the history of the country's hair and dress regulations, the ban on students' hairstyles and dress was first introduced in 1969 by the ministry, and is now considered to be a relic of authoritarianism. According to hair-regulation criteria between 1969 and 1978, as provided by the MOE, secondary-school boys were required to sport crew cuts, there had to be no hair on their temples and strange hairstyles were not allowed. Girls' hair, on the other hand, had to be ear-length and neither dyed nor permed.
TAIPEI TIMES FILE PHOTO BY CHEN CHING-MIN
The ministry in 1984 issued an official dress code for secondary-school students. While there was no detailed requirements, the ministry requested that students' clothes be "neat," "simple" and "graceful."
Six months before the then-ruling Chinese Nationalist Party lifted martial law in 1987, the MOE banned hair regulations at secondary schools. The announcement stated that secondary-school students' hairstyles should be "simple, neat and easy to freshen up." But "schools can draw up their own regulations based on the above principles and opinions from teachers, students and parent representatives."
Schools continued to enforce strict rules, and rushing to get haircuts or preparing white shoes and socks the night before their schools' appearance-checkup day has remained a school memory for most Taiwanese people.
"Our director of student affairs once cut a student's hair during a hair checkup in front of everybody, because he used styling gel on his hair. My teacher even asked a barber to come to school and give each of us a haircut to make sure our hairstyles conformed to school rules," said Jimmy Chuang (
Jimmy said that while the school informed them about the MOE's policy, hair regulations continued to be enforced even though students were allowed to sport their hair a little longer. Every month at schools' morning rally, the director of student affairs or instructors would do a routine hair and dress checkup. Students who failed the checkup would be punished with points deducted from their grades.
"Having to get a haircut at least once a month was a hassle. But I think most of my male classmates felt OK with the crew-cut hairstyle," Chuang said.
"Girls hated the hair regulations more because their prescribed hairstyle gave them `watermelon heads,' and it was not pretty," he said. Years after the ministry's first official ban on hair regulations, secondary-school boys no longer need to sport the crew-cut hairstyle and girls can wear their hair to at least shoulder-length.
But most schools never gave up the authority to exercise proper discipline regarding students' appearance. It seems that most of the schools decided to stick to their guns when education officials this time around chose to stand firmly on the side of students' hairstyle rights when the legitimacy of the regulations was questioned by students in a protest last month.
Many secondary-school principals were surprised at Education Minister Tu Cheng-sheng's (
Some schools' principals called the changes a "travesty of education in the guise of democracy." A number of them vowed to maintain existing regulations.
Tan Guang-ding (
"But I do not agree that hair regulations are a violation of students' human rights. Students come to school to receive an education and proper discipline. Schools' authority over students' hairstyles should not be denied," Tan said.
Facing a cool response from school principals, Vice Minister of Education Fan Sun-lu (
Fan called on schools to give students the right to choose their own hairstyles, given that this is a democratic society.
"This was consistent with the idea that schools aim at teaching students to be responsible members of society by making decisions for themselves and thinking on their own," she said.
As many school principals hesitated to give up their authority over students' hair, however, hairstyle rights advocates may need to continue their fight until students can express themselves through various hairstyles without any restraints.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) mention of Taiwan’s official name during a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Wednesday was likely a deliberate political play, academics said. “As I see it, it was intentional,” National Chengchi University Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies professor Wang Hsin-hsien (王信賢) said of Ma’s initial use of the “Republic of China” (ROC) to refer to the wider concept of “the Chinese nation.” Ma quickly corrected himself, and his office later described his use of the two similar-sounding yet politically distinct terms as “purely a gaffe.” Given Ma was reading from a script, the supposed slipup
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
The bodies of two individuals were recovered and three additional bodies were discovered on the Shakadang Trail (砂卡礑) in Taroko National Park, eight days after the devastating earthquake in Hualien County, search-and-rescue personnel said. The rescuers reported that they retrieved the bodies of a man and a girl, suspected to be the father and daughter from the Yu (游) family, 500m from the entrance of the trail on Wednesday. The rescue team added that despite the discovery of the two bodies on Friday last week, they had been unable to retrieve them until Wednesday due to the heavy equipment needed to lift