The Council of Grand Justices convened a meeting yesterday to review a constitutional interpretation request filed by the legislative caucus of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to have the fingerprinting provision in the Household Registration Law (
Article 8 of the law stipulates that people claiming new national identification cards must be fingerprinted, which critics say encroaches upon their basic human rights.
DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (
The Council of Grand Justices will continue to review the matter today.
Gao said after reporting to the Council of Grand Justices that a majority of people support fingerprinting, which he said reflects "a failure of human rights education."
He equated fingerprinting to strip searches, saying that the policy is akin to treating everyone like a criminal suspect. He added that fingerprinting violates people's inalienable right to privacy.
The lawmaker also said that if the government is allowed to use social order as an excuse to strip the people of their rights, then there is nothing stopping it from using other national security reasons to encroach upon people's other rights.
The government originally planned to require people to be fingerprinted when they apply for the new national identification card which is set to be issued from today.
On May 30, the DPP filed the constitutional interpretation request after human rights groups expressed concerns with the fingerprinting policy.
In view of the limited time available, the council on June 10 ordered a moratorium on the policy until it releases its interpretation.
Meanwhile, Interior Minister Su Jia-chyuan (
Su made the remarks on the sidelines of an award presentation ceremony as the Council of Grand Justices began earlier in the day to review a constitutional interpretation request filed by the DPP to have the fingerprinting provision in the Household Registration Law invalidated because of concerns that it violates human rights.
The ministry had planned to require that people be fingerprinted when claiming the new version of the national identification card originally set to begin to be issued from today. However, after the legislative caucus of the DPP requested an interpretation May 30, the Council of Grand Justices on June 10 placed a moratorium on the policy until it reviews the request and releases its interpretation.
Noting that a majority of people support the fingerprinting policy, Su said, the ministry hopes the grand justices will deliver a ruling as soon as possible.
He pointed out that in the UK, an ID card bill which includes a fingerprinting requirement recently passed its second reading in the House of Commons. He noted that even the UK, a country noted for championing human rights, is rethinking its policy on fingerprinting.
In addition, the US now requires arriving visitors to be fingerprinted, Su said, adding that many people who oppose fingerprinting in Taiwan comply with the fingerprinting regulation when traveling to the US. These people are adopting a "double standard," he said.
As many industrial countries are now changing their policies on fingerprinting to protect the security of the people and the nation, Su urged the Taiwanese people to think about whether Taiwan, faced with a growing number of Chinese and Southeast Asian immigrants, should maintain the fingerprint requirement.
"The concept of human rights changes, and we need to carefully consider whether sticking to the old human rights standards will lead to social disorder," Su said.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all