The recent plethora of constitutional interpretation requests are natural and necessary in a budding democracy, political observers said yesterday.
"In a country like Taiwan, whose democratic development is still in its infancy, it is necessary to ask the Justices of the Constitutional Court to interpret the Constitution to help shape social consensus over the constitutional system," said Taipei Society president Allen Houng (
It is not a bad thing to see political parties or individuals file for contitutional interpretations, Houng said, because the Constitution is a set of rules, and not a living thing.
It is bound to cause confusion when it is implemented and needs to be interpreted for specific cases and bring them up to date. Such moves should be regarded as part of the civic movement and treated as positive, he said.
His opinion was echoed by Lo Cheng-tien (
"There is nothing wrong with legislators requesting a constitutional interpretation, as long as they can manage to obtain the endorsement of one-third of the lawmaking body," Lo said. "It is, however, usually used by political parties refusing to accept their defeat or failure in the political arena, and therefore hope to turn things around in the constitutonal court."
The People First Party (PFP) legislative cause yesterday petitioned to the Council of Grand Justices and asked them to rule on whether the National Assembly can vote on the constitutional amendment package passed by the legislature last August because of the record low turnout rate in the assembly election.
The caucus claimed that the 23.35 percent voter turnout hardly represents the will of the people.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) legislative cause is scheduled to file a request for constitutional interpretation from the Council of Grand Justices today.
They would like the grand justices to rule on whether Article 9 of the Statute Governing the Operation of the National Assembly (
The article stipulates that the constitutional amendment package should be voted on by the assembly separately, rather than as a whole.
Both the PFP and TSU are against the constitutional amendments. While the PFP won 18 seats in the assembly, the TSU won 21.
In additon to the PFP and TSU, the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which is the largest party in the assembly and takes up 127 seats, has also filed for a constitutional interpertation request, arguing that the three-quarters ratification threshold is unconstitutional.
The DPP also argued that it is unconstitutional to include invalid ballots when counting the total number of votes.
The DPP caucus has filed another constitutional interpretation on the government's controversial policy of collecting fingerprints for the new national identification cards. The collection of fingerprints for the new cards is slated to begin on July 1.
It is planning to file another request on the operation of the legislature's Procedure Committee, which it said violates the Constitution by habitually blocking goverment bills, including the confirmation of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Another request waiting to be filed is on the legislative committee's right to unfreeze goverment budgets. The lawmaking body recently has ruled that frozen governement funds can only be unfrozen with the consent of the plenary legislative session.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods