The pan-blue camp yesterday rejected the breakthrough in the investigation into the March 19 assassination attempt, with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) reaffirming its pledge to organize a march on the first anniversary of the shooting.
The KMT hopes to attract between 50,000 and 100,000 people for the event on Saturday. The procession is scheduled to begin at the Sungshan Tobacco Factory and end in front of the Presidential Office on Ketagalan Boulevard.
Responding to the latest development in the investigation, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) told reporters yesterday that the March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee must continue its work because the truth has not yet come out.
PHOTO: SEAN CHAO, TAIPEI TIMES
"While questions posed by the committee still remain unanswered, it makes sense for the committee to continue its work and discover the genuine truth of the shooting incident," Lien said.
Many pan-blue camp politicians and supporters continue to believe that Chen somehow staged his own shooting in a bid to win sympathy votes in last year's closely contested presidential election.
KMT Spokesman Chang Jung-kung (張榮恭) said that his party will hold a march on the first anniversary of the shooting to remind the public of the damage he said it had done to the nation's democratic development.
"We find the `significant breakthrough' proclaimed by the prosecutors hard to swallow," Chang said. "We're afraid that the truth will never come out and I believe both the Taiwanese people and the international community will continue to doubt the legitimacy of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁)."
KMT caucus whip Chen Chieh (陳杰) said that he was "apprehensive" and "stunned" by prosecutors' findings.
"I am surprised that their discovery coincides with the rumor that the culprit is already dead," he said, adding that further investigation is required to find out more about the case.
People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
"As the incident has become a legal case, we will let the judicial system take care of it," he said.
But Chang added that he suspects Prosecutor-General Wu Ying-chao (
PFP Legislator Liu Wen-hsiung (
"It is hilarious that the police claimed that they made a breakthrough, while there is no witness or substantial evidence," Liu said. "We'd also like to know what the motive is and whether there is an accomplice."
Liu, who was elected yesterday as one of the three chairmen of the legislature's judicial committee, vowed to ask Minister of Justice Morley Shih (施茂林) to deliver a report on the matter once the committee meets.
Dismissing the breakthrough as a "distraction tactic," PFP caucus whip Chen Chih-bin (陳志彬) charged that the finding is politically motivated.
"We think further investigation should be carried out, trials held and witnesses questioned, because the truth is not out and many questions remained unanswered," Chen Chih-bin said.
Echoing Chen's opinion, PFP Legislator Li Yong-ping (李永萍) said that the DPP-led government is using a dead person to solve a political dispute. Li also pledged to amend the March 19 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee Statute (三一九槍擊事件真相調查特別委員會條例) to bolster its work.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods