The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) should make public the sources of its campaign funding for the legislative elections, the pan-blue alliance demanded yesterday, voicing suspicions that the DPP administration has been improperly using the political clout of major party-affiliated government officials to put pressure on businesses.
The legislative caucuses of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP) yesterday said the huge amounts of money the DPP has been able to raise and spend on its legislative campaign this year was suspicious.
The two opposition parties' legislative caucuses yesterday held press conferences in response to media reports that the DPP has raised its fundraising goal by NT$30 million to NT$90 million.
The DPP's fundraising goals have been a source of contention for the pan-blue camp since the figures were made public last month. According to these goals, Vice President Annette Lu (
In response to the DPP's fundraising expectations for party-affiliated heads of state-run companies, KMT legislative caucus whip Huang Teh-fu (黃德福) said that the DPP has violated the spirit of the Political Donation Law (政治獻金法), which he said was meant to limit donations from big businesses to the government.
Huang said the reason why the DPP has been able to hold so many campaign events and rallies this year is because it has opened a "government-business intermediary company," estimating that the DPP must have spent at least NT$700 million on rallies thus far.
KMT spokesman Chang Jung-kung (
"We are very envious of a party that claims to have no party assets, yet has the huge amount of money it takes to hold large-scale rallies like it's been doing," Chang said.
"If the DPP is using party members that are heads of state-run industries for donations, we wonder if the national treasury has become the party treasury. By having the nation's premier and vice premier collect donations, we wonder, have there been any `unwilling' donations? Also, among those donating, how many are there with impure motives?" Chang asked.
"We ask the DPP to publicize its donation sources. Otherwise, it means that the DPP is using its political power to expand those assets that will never see the light of day," Chang said, adding that he was not aware of any large contributions to the KMT's campaign fund.
"We have gotten a number of small donations, since the current position of the KMT is felt by the public. Luckily, there are many justice-loving citizens who are willing to give us the small amount of money it takes to run our ads," Chang said.
The KMT greatly scaled down campaigning this year due to its apparently risky financial situation.
Although the KMT could offer no proof of its suspicions yesterday, the PFP's legislative caucus urged businesses to come forward if they have been forced to donate money by the DPP.
PFP party whip Liu Wen-hsiung (劉文雄) implied that the PFP had proof that the DPP had exerted political pressure on a marine shipping company to donate money for the March presidential election, adding that the PFP would help those who come forward to take legal action.
Without giving further details, Liu called on Yang Ming Marine Transport (
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods