Taipei Times: You were criticized by political figures because embankments in the disaster zone were destroyed. Some attributed this failure of flood-prevention measures to your promotion of ecological engineering methods. How do you respond to this criticism?
Kuo Ching-chiang (郭清江): There are no grounds for the accusations. Certain political figures know nothing of ecological engineering methods. In addition, they have failed to provide any evidence [for their claims]. My investigation shows that most of the incapacitated embankments were built a long time ago in conventional ways, which rely heavily on the adoption of reinforced concrete.
TT: What is an ideal construction that adopts ecological engineering methods or concepts of ecotechnology?
PHOTO: CHIU YU-TZU
Kuo: It must be a construction that is built on the basis that both biodiversity and human safety are ensured. After all, sustainable development requires the implementation of appropriate environmentally friendly technologies.
TT: What are some examples of this?
Kuo: Reconstruction work on the Houfantzukeng River in Shuang-hsi Township, Taipei County, is one. In addition, we have others in central Taiwan. Most of them actually survived the recent floods.
(Note: After the 921 Earthquake in 1999, Kuo urged Taiwanese engineers to abandon cement and take into account the ecological and social sustainability of new technologies. On the Houfantzu-keng River, government engineers assisted with the building of wood piles, boulder embankments and the rearrangement of rocks already in the river to control current speed.)
TT: Why have you become a target of criticism for the failure of some embankments?
Kuo: Some of the constructions ruined by the floods were actually supervised by the Water Resources Agency. Due to resistance by some engineers in adopting the new concepts of ecological conservation, these constructions were built using conventional methods and were not concerned with ensuring biodiversity.
TT: Why do some engineers feel uncomfortable about adopting ecological methods?
Kuo: Knowledge is power. Without knowledge, you feel powerless. For most engineers receiving conventional training, it's hard to accept revolutionary concepts that promote ecological pre-servation. So far, there has been no innovative construction of retaining walls alongside rivers. They are reluctant to abandon reinforced concrete. The failure of conventional embankments during the recent floods can be attributed to not only excess rainfall but also old and deficient construction. It has nothing to do with our promotion of ecological methods.
TT: Do you have evidence of the advantages of adopting these methods?
Kuo: In Wufeng township, Tai-chung County, only three out of more than 60 sites on hillsides where these methods were adopted were affected by the floods. In Tungshih township, Taichung County, we found that only two out of about 150 sites using the methods had collapsed. At a site in Hoping township alongside the Wushihkeng river, a tributary of the Ta'an River, a restored and steep 350m-long slope which collapsed during the 921 Earthquake remained covered with vegetation.
TT: Will you continue to promote ecological engineering methods?
Kuo: Certainly. Taiwan has no choice but to continue adopting such means in future construction projects to ensure not only public safety but also biodiversity. In terms of sustainable development, engineering methods that pay no attention to the preservation of biodiversity would eventually result in a negative impact on social development.
TT: Why is it good for Taiwan?
Kuo: More than a month ago, I was invited to give a speech at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. At a meeting entitled "Lessons learned from Taiwan," I gave several examples of Taiwan integrating concepts of ecological conservation with engineering methods. The attendees including representatives from developing countries and UN experts, were enthusiastic about Taiwan's performance. Representatives from Tanzania, Kenya and India said to me that Taiwan should pass on such expertise to their countries. This will be an effective tool not only to mitigate damage brought on by natural disasters but also to strengthen diplomatic relations. I understand that ecotechnology transfer will be carried out in the near future though official channels.
TT: Are ecological engineering methods part of a global trend?
Kuo: Absolutely. From June 28 to July 2, I attended the 9th International Symposium on Landslides held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. My presentation at the symposium delivered the message that Taiwan is promoting ecological engineering methods. Many representatives from countries that suffer from similar natural disasters said that Taiwan's experience deserved to be studied in more detail. Unfortunately, voices opposing ecological engineering methods are from within the country. We need to think about this situation very carefully.
TT: Are you confident you can convince your critics that your position is the right one?
Kuo: Many political figures in fact understand the importance of taking environmental protection and ecological conservation into account when implementing policies. However, it's not easy for them to make themselves accept new practices. Construction costs for ecologically restoring one hectare of a slope are only about one-tenth of the conventional practice. It's almost impossible for political figures to reap profits from such constructions.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all