The pan-blue camp yesterday decided not to immediately appeal the Taiwan High Court's decision to reject its lawsuits to overturn the result of the presidential election -- and urged the pan-green camp to agree to a "judicial and administrative recount."
"By law, we are allowed to either re-file the suits after the Central Election Committee [CEC] announces the winner on Friday or appeal to the Supreme Court immediately. We decided to wait," said People First Party (PFP) Taipei City Councilwoman Huang Shan-shan (
According to Huang, the pan-blue camp's new proposal for a "judicial and administrative recount" seeks to have the recount conducted publicly in the presence of judges, prosecutors, lawyers, officials of both camps, CEC officials and neutral third-party representatives.
"This is the fastest way that we can finish this," Huang said. "We are hoping that our opponents will agree to our proposal."
Speaking on behalf of the pan-green camp, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislative caucus leader Tsai Huang-lang (蔡煌瑯) said the DPP would accept all kinds of suggestions on how to complete the recount as soon as possible.
However, Tsai said, the recount had to proceed through legal means.
"As far as I am concerned, the administrative recount would be the fastest way to finish this, and we will try our best to amend the law and make it happen as soon as possible," Tsai said. "However, we also hope that the pan-blue camp will consider canceling their rally on Saturday."
The pan-blue camp's latest proposal may not be a practical one because it is not supported by any law. At present, there are two ways to carry out a recount -- a "judicial recount" and "administrative recount."
For a "judicial recount," the plaintiff has to file a suit with the Taiwan High Court and provide sufficient evidence to prove that there were errors during the election. The Presidential and Vice Presidential Election and Recall Law (
An "administrative recount" would be based upon a decision from the CEC. If more than half of the commission members at a meeting agree to a recount, then it can be carried out. An "administrative recount" would probably cost between NT$300 million and NT$500 million.
Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (
Meanwhile, lawmakers are trying to amend the Presidential Election and Recall Law by adding a clause such that "when the difference of the total amount of votes for both candidates is within 1 percent, an administrative recount shall be carried out by the CEC within seven days after the election day."
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) said that the legislature is trying to amend and pass the law within 15 days. He has urged President Chen Shui-bian (
Under Article 43 of the Constitution, a presidential "emergency decree" is above all kinds of laws. Usually, its use has been limited to times of natural disasters, diseases or crises. In the history of the Republic of China, there have been five presidential emergency decrees.
The first was issued in 1948, when the country was experiencing a financial instability. The second was in 1959, when millions of people were suffering from a serious flood. The third was in 1978, when the US decided to break diplomatic relations with Taipei. The fourth was in 1988, when then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) died. The fifth one was in 1999, following the 921 earthquake.
Also see stroy:
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods