Sun, Mar 02, 2003 - Page 2 News List

Reform foundation lashes out at lawmaker's proposal

IN COLD BLOOD The KMT's Chen Chien-min put forward a proposal that some see as an extension of a personal grudge against Judicial Yuan President Weng Yueh-sheng

By Jimmy Chuang  /  STAFF REPORTER

Academics and lawyers yesterday blasted a KMT legislator's proposed amendments to the Organic Law of Judicial Yuan Organization (司法院組織法), which they see as a ploy to block Judicial Yuan President Weng Yueh-sheng's (翁岳生) renomination.

According to a bill proposed by Chen Chien-min last month (陳健民), eligible candidates for the Judicial Yuan presidency and vice president must be aged between 45 and 65.

However, under Chen's draft bill, Judicial Yuan Vice President Cheng Chung-mo (城仲模), who is six years younger than Weng, would become the body's sole candidate. Weng will turn 71 on July 1.

Taipei Society president Ku Chung-hwa (顧忠華) said that Chen's proposals did not follow a consensus reached at the 1999 National Judicial Reform Seminar.

"His proposal, which was endorsed by another 34 lawmakers, strikes me as a drag to the judicial reform," Ku said.

"We don't want any politics playing a part in the judicial reform, however, this proposal looks quite political," Ku said.

To make the proposal official, Chen Chien-min will need another 78 signatures.

Yesterday morning, the Judicial Reform Foundation and the Taiwan Law Society held a seminar to discuss Chen's controversial proposal.

The seminar was hosted by Hsu Tsung-li (許宗力), the dean of the law department of the National Taiwan University (NTU), and attended by Ku, NTU law professors Lin Tzu-yi (林子儀), Huang Chao-yuan (黃昭元), National Chengchi University law professor Chen Hwei-syin (陳惠馨), Judicial Reform Foundation executive member and lawyer Joseph Lin (林永頌), National Bar Association executive member Huang Kuo-chung (黃國鐘) and lawyer Cheng Wen-lung (鄭文龍).

None of them affirmed the proposal.

Joseph Lin said that he was worried that this proposal would not help judicial reform at all.

"Honestly, I see lots of politics and personal grudges in this proposal. But the judicial system should be independent. This is a contradiction, isn't it?" he said.

In addition to the age restrictions, Chen's proposal also stated that to qualify for nomination as a grand justice, the candidate has to serve as a Supreme Court judge for at least three years.

Chen's motivation for the proposal was also questioned by fellow lawmakers.

DPP legislative whip Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) accused Chen Chien-min of using the measure to get back at Weng, who he says turned down Chen Chien-min's application for a job three years ago.

Chen Chi-mai's allegation was immediately dismissed by Chen Chien-min.

This story has been viewed 2728 times.
TOP top