Scholars and human-rights activists said yesterday that charges against the China Times and Next magazine for breaching national security violate freedom of the press.
The critics charge that the response to the publication of stories on two secret funds at the National Security Bureau (NSB) ironically repeats what the nation suffered under KMT rule in the 1970s and 1980s.
But they emphasized that Taiwan's priority should be passing new laws to regulate the nation's secret activities.
The charges against the publications have sparked debate among scholars, government officials and media workers over whether national-security concerns can be used as a pretext to censor the media.
The Taiwan Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, the Association of Taiwan Journalists and the Taiwan Association for Human Rights jointly held a press conference yesterday to find a way to resolve the conflict between national security and freedom of the press.
Scholars who experienced martial law before 1989 commented that it's ironic for them to see DPP politicians -- some of whom were charged and jailed by the KMT government for their publications -- treating the media in the same way they once resented.
"Magazines published by DPP politicians enlightened me, but these politicians now use the same pretext to ban other publications from printing. Is this really about Taiwan's national security or just something unpresentable?" said Chen Hsin-hsing (
DPP legislators, however, emphasized that Taiwan's stability should outweigh other concerns.
"Those special agents who risk their lives for the country should be our priority," DPP lawmaker Lin Cho-shui (
Another DPP official echoed Lin's statement.
"We didn't need to worry about how to implement our platforms when we were an opposition party; but ... our priority is society's stability," said Wang Tuoh (王拓), chief executive of the DPP legislative caucus.
"But I am opposed to the prosecutors' search of the magazine," he added.
Human-rights activists said that prosecutors' actions against the media organizations are in violation of UN protocol.
"President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) had promised to sign the [UN's] international human rights declaration, but what Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) said totally broke that declaration," said Lin Feng-jeng (林峰正), head of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights.
"Based on Article 19 of the declaration, every individual has the right to say what he or she wants to say, as well as to communicate with others by whatever media he or she chooses," Lin added.
Chen Ding-nan defended the prosecutors' search of Next, saying, "There should be certain limits on press freedom. News reports should not break the law and newspaper offices should not be exempt from searches."
Reporters, meanwhile, questioned the two media organizations' ethics.
"Media should deal with the issue [of national security] very carefully. Reviewing the case, is it appropriate to say `Lee Teng-hui (
"Is it appropriate for news organizations to use stolen materials?" he said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods