Environmentalists and the Env-ironmental Protection Agency (EPA) were at odds yesterday over the upcoming ban on plastic bags and utensils.
While the EPA defended the policy, environmental activists argued at a public hearing that banning plastic would result in a new problem -- a paper problem.
PHOTO: CHIANG YING-YING, TAIPEI TIMES
According to the EPA, the new policy banning plastic shopping bags and disposable dining utensils from July would encourage more environmentally-friendly behavior from consumers and would not hurt the fortunes of the plastic industry.
Environmentalists, however, said that the last thing they want is to see paper become the replacement of choice for bags and utensils, as studies show that even more pollutants would be created -- not by their disposal but by their production. That combined with the additional waste paper should give EPA officials pause over the consequences of the new policy.
In February, the EPA announced that starting July 1, retailers at certain locations would be prohibited from offering customers free plastic shopping bags and disposable dining utensils.
The new regulations would affect publicly operated grocery stores and restaurants at government buildings, public and private educational establishments and military organizations.
Officials said yesterday that the second stage in carrying out the policy would begin Jan. 1 next year. Places affected will include department stores, supermarkets, convenience stores, fast food stores and those with shop fronts -- almost every type of retailer, barring street vendors.
Statistically, Taiwan consumes 65,000 tonnes of plastic annually for producing shopping bags and 59,000 tonnes for disposable dining utensils.
If the policy is carried out, EPA officials believe that consumers will consume 30.8 percent fewer shopping bags and 37.7 percent fewer disposable dining utensils by the end of 2003,
"One-and-a-half years after the policy's implementation, plastic manufacturers are expected to consume 36,000 tonnes less of the raw materials required to manufacture plastic, accounting for 3.5 percent of the existing [plastic production] market in Taiwan," Environmental Protection Administrator Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) said at a press conference yesterday.
Hau said that the idea behind the policy of banning plastic is to encourage people to abandon habits of using disposable products and condition industry into producing fewer plastic products.
According to the EPA, people tend to discard thin plastic bags and re-use thicker ones. For this reason, plastic bags with a thickness of less than 0.1mm will be totally eliminated. Bags with a thickness exceeding 0.1mm, however, will will remain available, but people will have to pay a fee at the checkout counter.
Chen Hsiung-wen (陳雄文), director-general of the EPA's Bureau of Solid Waste Management, said that store owners who violate the policy by offering free bags or selling the wrong thickness of bag would be fined a minimum of NT$60,000 and face a maximum penalty of NT$300,000, according to the Waste Disposal Act.
Considering the existing models of consumption in Taiwan, EPA officials said, plastic materials used for packing meat, fish, vegetable, medicine and other products directly from factories would be exempt from the ban.
At a public hearing held by the EPA yesterday, environmentalists criticized the agency for its reluctance to ban the use of paper products, which look destined to replace plastic products.
"The EPA will only turn plastic waste into paper waste if it doesn't also ban the use of paper products," said Eric Liou (劉銘龍), secretary-general of the Environmental Quality Protection Foundation (環境品質文教基金會).
EPA statistics show that 20 percent of the nation's garbage is plastic, far higher than in many other developed countries.
In addition, citing studies by National Taiwan University, environmentalists argued that the process of producing paper dining boxes consumes 24 times more water than that used to produce plastic dining boxes.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all