Taipei Times: Is the DPP in need of reform?
Shen Fu-hsiung (沈富雄): The DPP has grown to such an extent that it must transform or it cannot function effectively. As seen over the past two years, the party's headquarters and its legislative caucus did not communicate well with the Presidential Office or the Cabinet.
PHOTO: GEORGE TSORNG, TAIPEI TIMES
Though differing on how to reform the party, most members share the need to internalize it. By internalization, we mean that the party should revolve around its legislative caucus. This planned change is consistent with the spirit of democracy, as lawmakers won their office through popular elections. Internalization is inevitable for parties that wield substantial influence in the legislature.
In Britain, for example, the prime minister is also the leader of the party in power. Opposition parties with sizable seats, such as the KMT and the PFP, need internalizing even more, as the legislature is the only stage on which they can carry out their platform. Disagreements arise when the party's leaders are not also members of its caucus, which is the case with the DPP. And the transfer of power has only served to compound the problem.
TT: What would you suggest the party do to internalize?
Shen: To achieve that, it is important that the party's top posts be filled by its lawmakers. If this cannot be done, the two groups should at least work at the same office building to enhance bilateral communication. President Chen Shui-bian (
It is odd for the party to keep departments of international affairs and China affairs when it is in power. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Mainland Affairs Council will carry out the president's policy plans.
Also, I suggest the Central Standing Committee meet every two months rather than every week. The committee should act as a board of directors and empower managers (party executives and caucus leaders) to run the party's day-to-day business.
If the president agrees to concurrently serve as the party's chairman, some have suggested giving him the right to appoint members to the committee so he may have a decisive say during its meetings. The committee may then replace the nine-member policy-making task force. President Chen is receptive to the idea and suggested expanding the committee to include Cabinet officials and local DPP administrators.
I find this arrangement problematic. The larger a panel, the more difficult it will be to reach a consensus. You cannot expand the committee while seeking to suppress divergent views. Personally, I find it ill-conceived to invite Cabinet officials or local administrators to attend the Central Standing Committee forums. Many Cabinet officials are not DPP members and will not necessarily endorse the party's policy stands.
Local administrators, on the other hand, assign more weight to their constituencies than to the party's smooth running. For instance, Kaohsiung City and Taipei County may disagree over how to divide budget-allocation funds. It is better for the party to stay above provincial disputes when weighing national affairs.
Meeting less frequently, the committee will be deprived of its importance, and President Chen may find it less controversial to head the party.
TT: How can the party and caucus better communicate with the Cabinet and the Presidential Office?
Shen: According to my reform plan, there should be a regular meeting, preferably on Monday evening, between the Cabinet and the caucus -- each side should send no more than three representatives. It is difficult to reach a consensus when more people take part. If pensions for senior citizens is the dominant issue of the week, the interior minister may meet with the chairman of the legislature's Home and Nations Committee to iron out their differences.
Currently, the caucus convenes Tuesday, when Cabinet officials are often invited to keep members posted on major policymaking moves. Those meetings are usually lengthy and are seldom fruitful.
Next, I suggest the president meet with the premier once a week, preferably on Saturday afternoon or Sunday evening. The premier should brief the president on his administration for the past week. The president can then instruct the premier on how to enhance his work for the following week.
If the president decides not to take the party's leadership, he may hold irregular meetings with the chairman. Currently, President Chen meets with DPP Chairman Frank Hsieh (
TT: Did the nine-member policy-making task force fail to serve as a venue of communication?
Shen: It has proved ineffectual, as President Chen has admitted himself. That explains why it has been halted for a while. It is not surprising. The participants at the meeting often failed to agree with one another.
The Cabinet was preoccupied with implementing policies approved by the legislature; the legislative whips gave top priority to their constituencies; and the party was most concerned about fulfilling its platform. Attendees even disagreed on the meeting's venue and frequently complained about not being taken seriously.
TT: How do you expect the caucus to interact with the Presidential Office?
Shen: I don't think the president should get involved in the caucus' functioning. He should not have picked the candidate for vice legislative speaker on the caucus' behalf, for example. The intervention annoyed quite a few caucus members.
TT: What happens if the DPP loses power?
Shen: If the DPP loses the presidency, it can call a direct election by all its members to decide who its chairman will be, though such a move would go against the principle of internalization. Theoretically, I think the chairman should be elected by lawmakers.
In any event, to ensure policy consistency, the caucus should hold a meeting to confirm its presidential candidate's campaign promises and make them the party's platform for the next four years after the party wins the presidency.
The party can then discard its original platform. It is meaningless to keep a platform that stands no chance of being realized anyway. The party's existing platform was written when the DPP was an opposition party. It has proven to be a burden to the Chen administration in the past two years as evidenced by the constant bashing of the president by the opposition parties.
When the party is not in power, the caucus should adopt a set of policies on its own and push for its passage in the legislature. With this change, both the president and the caucus will avoid making irresponsible pledges on the campaign trail.
TT: What are the prospects of your party reform plan being approved by the DPP at its upcoming congress?
Shen: I expect resistance from delegates to the party's congress, as they will be deprived of the right to approve the party's policies. The Cabinet has no preference either way, and the caucus generally backs my package.
Still, it is up to the president to decide whether he would take up the party's chairmanship. Last week, he appeared quite enthusiastic about the suggestion. But the enthusiasm significantly subsided this week.
Polls show most DPP supporters have no objection to Chen steering the party, whereas people who don't support the party overwhelmingly frowned on the practice. But it is the opinion of non-aligned voters that concerns the president the most. He may name a close aide to run the party on his behalf if he continues to refrain from party activities in keeping with his pledge during the presidential campaign in 2000.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods