Tue, Jul 16, 2019 - Page 16 News List

England win World Cup after classic

‘RIDICULOUS’:A sporting contest for the ages finished with England winning courtesy of a tiebreaker that few inside Lord’s had ever heard of: Boundaries count back

AP, LONDON

England captain Eoin Morgan, center, lifts the World Cup after the hosts won the Cricket World Cup final against New Zealand at Lord’s in London on Sunday.

Photo: AFP

Jos Buttler threw his gloves into the sky and wheeled away in celebration. Jofra Archer slid on his chest across the Lord’s turf and beat the ground. Joe Root punched the air as he was lifted up by a teammate.

After more than nine stomach-churning hours, the first super over in Cricket World Cup history and one of the most extraordinary overs ever played, England ended their agonizing 44-year wait to be world champion of the sport they invented.

“The most ridiculous game of cricket to have ever been played,” was how Buttler, England’s wicketkeeper, summed up a crazy World Cup final against New Zealand on Sunday that had pretty much everything.

A sporting contest for the ages finished with England winning courtesy of a tiebreaker that few inside the home of cricket had likely ever heard of, or even understood: Boundaries count back.

That was because England and New Zealand — both bidding for a first Cricket World Cup title — could not be separated after the regulation 50 overs a side (each team scored 241) and then a nerve-shredding super over (both teams scored 15) played in early evening sunshine in northwest London.

In the end, England prevailed because they hit 26 boundaries — fours and sixes scored across both the 50 overs and the super over — compared with New Zealand’s 17.

“The guys are shattered,” New Zealand captain Kane Williamson said. “It’s devastating. Tough to swallow.”

It was a slow-burner of a final that reached an astonishing crescendo at Lord’s.

Chasing 242 to win after New Zealand won the toss and posted 241-8, England slumped to 86-4 before a partnership of 110 between Buttler (59) and New Zealand-born Ben Stokes (84) ensured the match would go to the wire.

Needing 22 to win off the final nine balls, Stokes smashed the ball high from Jimmy Neesham toward long-on. Trent Boult took the catch, but fell back and stood on the boundary cushion before he had time to release the ball to teammate Martin Guptill. Guptill signaled a six should be awarded and the umpires obliged.

The target to win was 15 heading into the final over, bowled by Boult. After two dot balls, Stokes slogged a six over midwicket. Nine runs were needed off three balls.

Stokes smashed the next ball into the leg side and set off to run two. As he sprinted back to the striker’s end, he dived and stretched his bat out in a desperate bid to reach the crease — only for the ball, thrown in by Guptill, to strike Stokes’ bat and deflect all the way to the boundary.

Confusion reigned, but England had just scored six runs — two run, along with a four.

Three required off two balls.

“That was a bit of a shame, wasn’t it?” Williamson said.

Stokes was still on strike and he pushed down the ground, setting off again for a two to ensure he kept the strike. Adil Rashid was running to the non-striker’s end and was easily run out, but Stokes had the strike and England had an extra run.

In an almost exact replica of that next-to-last delivery, Stokes toed a yorker out to long-on and again attempted to run two. This time it was Mark Wood run out at the non-striker’s end, but again England collected the single to take the match to the rare super over.

Fans had their hands around their heads in amazement. A rule explainer came up on the big screen.

After a 10-minute break, Stokes and Buttler — the first two of England’s three designated batsmen — came back out and hit 3, 1, 4, 1, 2 and 4 between them.

This story has been viewed 1371 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top