Sun, Jul 03, 2016 - Page 10 News List

Iceland following formula for upsets

NO PRESSURE: Iceland co-coach Heimir Hallgrimsson said his team wants to win, but added that they do not need to, which he said is a big benefit for them

Reuters, PARIS

Iceland players and staff huddle during a training session in Annecy, France, yesterday.

Photo: AFP

Take a tactically disciplined defense, add an eye for a timely counterattack and top off with boundless team spirit and a relentless work ethic, and you have a tried and tested formula for a so-called minnow to succeed at the UEFA European Championship.

Whether it is Greece’s victory at Euro 2004, Denmark’s success in 1992 or Iceland’s run to the quarter-finals at Euro 2016, the similarities between successful smaller nations and their approaches seem striking.

Iceland, who on Monday ended England’s tournament hopes, are a perfect example of how a team that lacks star players or the technical ability to hog possession can still thrive on the big stage.

Jointly coached by experienced Swede Lars Lagerback and Icelander Heimir Hallgrimsson, they do not try to dominate the ball against opponents stocked with technically superior players.

In fact, they have the lowest possession statistics of any side at Euro 2016 (35 percent), the second-lowest pass completion percentage (72 percent) and have attempted the fewest number of passes (907).

These are often seen as the metrics that define the best teams. Prior to the quarter-finals, world champions Germany, for example, topped Euro 2016’s possession table (64 percent) and had attempted the most passes (2,568).

So what are Iceland, and a host of successful minnows who have gone before, doing instead? Part of the answer is they are rigidly disciplined in their defensive duties and meticulous in their preparation.

Iceland defender Haukur Hauksson said that coach Lagerback becomes almost monomaniacal in the build-up to a game, drumming tactical instructions into his players.

“It’ is almost like he is brainwashing us with his tactics,” Hauksson said prior to the England clash.

German Otto Rehhagel, who led Greece to their triumph against the odds, had a similar dedication to tactical discipline.

Greece went into the tournament as rank outsiders with a completely unsung squad, but they played to their strengths — a solid defensive unit, guarded by the prowling presence of combative midfielder Theodoros Zagorakis, and a willingness to work hard all over the pitch.

Rehhagel set out to frustrate opponents until they made a mistake, with Greece winning all of their knockout matches 1-0, including an upset of hosts Portugal in the final.

They, like Iceland this year, were committed to playing on the counterattack and making the most of limited opportunities.

Greece had 21 shots on target, about half the amount of all the other three sides to reach the 2004 semi-finals.

Similarly, Iceland have had the fewest attempts on goal of any of the teams left in Euro 2016, with 29. However, they have scored six times.

Tactical and defensive discipline seems to be only part of the story behind a successful minnow.

They also seem to share an almost fanatical team spirit and a Stakhanovite work ethic.

Perhaps counter-intuitively, Albania coach Gianni de Biasi, whose side were knocked out in the group stage, suggested having a smaller pool of players might be an advantage.

“It is more difficult when you do not have so much time together to try to develop as a team and individuals, but perhaps, for the smaller countries, it is easier to create that spirit,” De Biasi said.

His point is seemingly that a lack of playing resources can make the squad and even the team almost self-selecting, creating a tighter, more cohesive group.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top