Fri, Oct 12, 2012 - Page 18 News List

Asian Cup qualifying format sparks debate

AP, SEOUL

The uneven qualifying format for the Asian Cup is generating debate around the region, with doubts raised about giving the continent’s best teams a bye while denying smaller nations a chance to learn from playing against their more accomplished neighbors.

This week’s preliminary qualifying draw for the 2015 Asian Cup did not include the top nations — they are given passage through to the final tournament — while the smaller countries were locked out. That removed the kind of David versus Goliath clashes that can clutter European qualifying for major tournaments, but which can also provide the occasional upset result.

Only 20 of the Asian Football Confederation’s 47 members came out of the hat in Melbourne in the qualifying draw.

As usual, the hosts do not have to qualify. In this case, it is Australia, although the Socceroos would not have had to qualify, anyway, after reaching the final of last year’s edition.

Defending champions Japan and South Korea have also been given a bye thanks to their performances at last year’s tournament.

It is more streamlined, but it does not sit well with everyone.

Thailand coach Winfried Schaefer, who saw his team drawn in a tough group with Iran, Kuwait and Lebanon, is among those who prefer a system where all of the confederation members enter the same qualifying tournament.

“It should be like Europe,” Schaefer said. “Why can Japan and [South] Korea go directly? At Euro 2012, Poland and Ukraine were the hosts, but Italy, England and Germany had to qualify.”

“It is good for us to play good teams — even if we have Korea and Japan in the same group,” he said. “That is okay, that is football. Korea and Japan should have to earn their place at the Asian Cup just like everyone else.”

South Korea, two-time continental champions, can plan more high-profile and lucrative friendlies, rather than qualifying for the Asian Cup, which takes place just six months after the 2014 World Cup.

“Generally, it has pros and cons,” said Park Yong-soo, head of Planning and Management at the Korea Football Association.

“If you look ahead to the 2014 World Cup, the host Brazil suffers in its FIFA rankings because it can’t play competitive games. Overall though, for us, not participating in Asian Cup qualification gives us the chance to play friendly games against stronger nations all around the world,” he said.

“We can even take part in some tournaments. Of course, the level of the teams in Asia is improving all the time ... but when we can, we want to play teams that are stronger than us and this gives us a broader perspective,” Park said.

For the lower-ranked teams in the confederation, their only route to the Asian Cup is by winning the AFC Challenge Cup, held every two years. India and North Korea won the 2008 and 2010 tournaments respectively to qualify for last year’s Asian Cup.

North Korea have already qualified for 2015 after winning this year’s AFC Challenge Cup, leaving the rest of Asia’s lower-ranked teams focusing on the 2014 tournament.

Nonong Araneta, president of the Philippine Football Federation, said he accepted the three-tier qualifying system and his nation’s place in the lowest tier.

“We are prepared to play any team as we are finding ways to improve,” he said.

“This week, we are in Bahrain to play a friendly and then we go to Kuwait, and these are difficult games,” Araneta said “At the moment, we are at the highest ever FIFA ranking [No. 147] behind Vietnam [No. 140] and Thailand [No. 139] in southeast Asia and we are climbing step by step.”

This story has been viewed 1378 times.
TOP top