One’s billed as an urban oasis, the other an Alpine escape.
One is millions of dollars over budget, the other raking in the cash.
It’s a tale of two very different athletes’ villages for next year’s Winter Olympics, but among the things they have in common is this: Both have given Nejat Sarp a full head of gray hair.
PHOTO: REUTERS
“Half is for Whistler and the other half is for Vancouver,” said Sarp, vice president of services and villages for the Vancouver Organizing Committee.
With six months until the Games, the athletes’ village in Vancouver and the one in Whistler are expected to be completed on time for the organizing committee to take over in November.
Together, they will house about 5,000 athletes and officials and provide services from post offices to play rooms.
Vancouver’s is all glass and steel, overlooking False Creek near downtown; Whistler is wooden homes against a backdrop of trees and mountains.
“We have to have a sense of place so that people know that not only am I attending an Olympics or Paralympics, that not only am I in Canada, nor only am I in BC, but I’m also in Whistler or in Vancouver,” Sarp said.
In Vancouver, the village site encompasses space for a dining hall that will later become a grocery store for the housing complex.
In Whistler, athletes will eat inside a jumbo tent.
POST-GAMES
The development in Whistler also includes an athletic center aimed at having athletes return to the mountain resort after the Games. There is also temporary housing that will be moved to other areas of the province after the Olympics.
Building villages in Vancouver and Whistler was part of the original bid for the Winter Games; transporting athletes in Vancouver to the host mountain resort was impractical and expensive.
Each village was designed with state-of-the-art environmental features.
The organizing committee is contributing funds to both projects — US$28 million to Vancouver and US$35 million to Whistler — the two villages were largely the responsibility of the respective communities to finance and build.
Whistler’s village is built on land donated by the government specifically for residential housing; Vancouver’s is built on prime inner-city real estate that cost a development company US$178 million.
The financing for construction of Vancouver’s village was at first almost entirely a private loan that was to be repaid from the proceeds of selling off 735 of the housing units following the Games. There are also 250 units of social housing and 120 rental suites.
Whistler chose to pay for its village through a combination of government money, tax revenues and post-Games resale.
MONEY WOES
Vancouver’s money woes began when construction costs started rising. Then the economy began to slow, and last autumn the financial company backing the developers began refusing to pay their loan.
A project originally expected to cost US$693 million was nudging toward US$924 million. And without the city stepping in, the job wasn’t going to get done. At the same time, sales of the units halted.
All the while, the development in Whistler continued below the radar.
The not-for-profit development company entrusted with building the complex of town homes, condominiums and rental units negotiated its loan with the BC Municipal Finance Authority, not private bankers.
Sales were strong from the start and now 97 percent of the 240 units are sold.
“It’s exceeded all expectations,” said Christopher Quinlan, a Whistler councilor.
Quinlan said the village, to be known as Cheakamus Crossing after the Olympics, will be a source of pride for the tight-knit community.
“To be there and be part of the legacy of the Games is going to be pretty phenomenal,” he said.
The community is exploring the idea of having athletes who stay there sign one door or create another memento.
In Vancouver, Meggs said he hopes that despite the financial challenges the village there sets a standard for the city.
“The Olympics are an opportunity for the city to reflect about what it wants to be,” he said. “The village is the city’s largest investment in the Olympics and it gives us a chance to see whether we’ve done a good enough job and whether we need to be better.”
US track and field athletes have about four dozen pieces to choose from when assembling their uniforms at the Olympics. The one grabbing the most attention is a high-cut leotard that barely covers the bikini line and has triggered debate between those who think it is sexist and others who say they do not need the Internet to make sure they have good uniforms. Among those critical or laughing at the uniforms included Paralympian Femita Ayanbeku, sprinter Britton Wilson and even athletes from other countries such as Britain’s Abigail Irozuru, who wrote on social media: “Was ANY female athlete consulted in
Four-time NBA all-star DeMarcus Cousins arrived in Taiwan with his family early yesterday to finish his renewed contract with the Taiwan Beer Leopards in the T1 League. Cousins initially played a four-game contract with the Leopards in January. On March 18, the Taoyuan-based team announced that Cousins had renewed his contract. “Hi what’s up Leopard fans, I’m back. I’m excited to be back and can’t wait to join the team,” Cousins said in a video posted on the Leopard’s Facebook page. “Most of all, can’t wait to see you guys, the fans, next weekend. So make sure you come out and support the Beer
Former US Masters champion Zach Johnson was left embarrassed after a foul-mouthed response to ironic cheers from spectators after a triple bogey at Augusta National on Friday. Johnson, the 2007 Masters winner, missed the cut after his three-over-par round of 75 left him on seven-over 151 for 36 holes, his six on the par-three 12th playing a big role in his downfall. Television footage showed Johnson reacting to sarcastic cheers and applause when he tapped in for the triple bogey by yelling: “Oh fuck off.” Such a response would be considered bad form in any golf tournament, but is particularly out of keeping
Taiwan’s Lee Jhe-huei and Yang Po-hsuan on Saturday won the men’s doubles bronze medal at the Badminton Asia Championships in Ningbo, China, after they were bested by the hosts in their semi-final. The Taiwanese shuttlers lost to China’s Liang Wei Keng and Wang Chang, who advanced to yesterday’s final against Malaysia’s Goh Sze Fei and Nur Izzudin. The Chinese pair outplayed Lee and Yang in straight games. Although the Taiwanese got off to a slow start in the first game, they eventually tied it 14-14, before Liang and Wang went on to blow past them to win 21-17. In the second game, Lee and