Wed, Feb 14, 2007 - Page 18 News List

MLB union asks to revisit doping ruling


The Major League Baseball Players Association asked a federal appeals court on Monday to revisit its December decision to allow investigators probing doping in sports to use the names and urine samples of more than 100 players who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs.

The 2-1 decision in December by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco overturned three lower court decisions and could help authorities pinpoint the source of steroids in the major leagues.

Seized files

Investigators seized computer files containing 2004 test results during raids of labs involved in MLB's testing program.

The samples were collected at the league's direction the previous year as part of a survey to gauge the prevalence of steroid use.

Players and owners agreed in their labor contract that the results would be confidential and each player was assigned a code number to be matched with his name.

Quest Diagnostics of Teterboro, New Jersey, one of the largest firms offering drug-testing services, in the US, analyzed more than 1,400 urine samples from players that season.

Comprehensive Drug Testing of Long Beach, California, collected the specimens and compiled the data. Comprehensive joined the players in their petition to the appeals court to rehear the case with 15 judges.

Testing positive

If the December decision survives, the players who tested positive could be called before a grand jury and asked how they obtained their steroids.

Federal investigators originally demanded to see the 2003 results for Barry Bonds, who recently re-signed with the Giants; Gary Sheffield, who was recently traded by the New York Yankees to the Detroit Tigers; the Yankees' Jason Giambi and seven other players.

When they raided the testing labs to obtain the 10 results in question, investigators also seized computer files containing the test results of nearly 100 other players not named in the government's subpoena and warrants.

"If the majority's decision is allowed to stand, it will create circuit law giving the government carte blanche to use a warrant for some piece of data on a computer as the pretext for seizing the entire computer and perusing its contents," attorneys for the union and lab wrote.

Stricter policy

The testing was part of the league's effort to determine whether a stricter drug-testing policy was needed.

Because five percent or more of the tests for steroids came back positive, testing with penalties was begun in 2004.

The lower courts had declared the use of the data beyond the original 10 names harassment and unreasonable.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top