So much for all that talk about a "Big Five" in golf.
It's still Tiger Woods and everyone else.
At least until Jack Nicklaus comes walking back over the Swilcan Bridge through the mist like a fugitive out of "Brigadoon." And even then, there are no guarantees.
"It's exciting to look forward to some good years in my 30s," said Woods, who doesn't cross that threshold until the end of December, "and hopefully into my 40s."
With the same mastery he displayed over the Old Course five years ago, Woods finished on the lead lap alone again. And if not for two loose shots over the final three holes at the US Open last month, he might very well be zooming toward the Grand Slam. Again.
Five years ago at St. Andrews, in the middle of the most sublime run the game has ever seen, Woods won by eight shots and his final score of 19 under was the lowest at a British Open in relation to par. On Sunday, with two of this season's majors pocketed and the final one looming next month, Woods finished five shots clear of the field at 14 under.
And both times the drama quotient was the same:
Zero.
Stop me when this begins to sound familiar.
"The golf ball was hit so flush all day," Woods said. "Every shot. It was one of those rounds that I will be thinking about for a long time."
And he is not the only one.
"He's very complete," said Jose Maria Olazabal, who played alongside Woods on Sunday and was fortunate to get his two Masters wins out of the way before Woods hit his stride the first time. "Right now, there is no competition."
Woods' so-called rivals -- Vijay Singh, Ernie Els, Phil Mickelson and Retief Goosen -- were supposed to be breathing down his neck. Instead, they melted like ice cream cones in the unseasonably warm Scottish summer. Woods now owns exactly one more major championship trophy -- 10 -- than all of them combined.
They had their chance. And after what happened here, they have to be wondering when -- maybe even if -- such opportunities will come their way again.
Woods went winless in the majors from the 2002 US Open until the Masters in April, a streak that stretched over 10 championships. During that slump -- and it's now official -- Singh and Els claimed one each to total three, Goosen added his second and Mickelson won his first and only.
Of the six players who slipped into the trophy presentations while Woods was off remaking his swing and getting married, only two were well known outside their own households: Jim Furyk and Mike Weir. For the record, it's worth listing the others -- Rich Beem, Ben Curtis, Shaun Micheel and Todd Hamilton -- since odds are we won't hear from any of them again.
your lying eyes
So when a BBC TV interviewer asked afterward what Woods thought about all those pronouncements he would never dominate again, he should have said, "Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?"
Instead, Woods smiled broadly and replied, "I can't say it on the air."
Still, he couldn't resist saying something.
"This is one reason why I made the changes. This is the reason why I did it."
Yet, as recently as the Masters this year, Woods still had his doubts. Coming down the stretch at Augusta, Chris DiMarco turned the tables and began stalking Woods. Tiger abandoned just about everything he and swing coach Hank Haney had worked on, and bogeyed the last two before winning in a playoff. At Pinehurst, a poor chip shot and a balky putter left the door open for Michael Campbell. He ironed out both those problems before he arrived here.
RSS