For a competition built on speed, power, aggressiveness and the not-so-occasional brawl, the National Hockey League has stayed curiously aloof from the world of drug testing.
The time has come for change.
As the NHL and its ice hockey players association skirmish over economic issues in collective bargaining, trying to avoid a lockout that could curtail or cancel next season, the doping issue should not be an afterthought or a bargaining chip as it was in major league baseball.
The NHL does not test for steroids, stimulants or any other performance-enhancing drugs. Players can juice up throughout the season without risk of penalties. All the league does is offer education and counseling.
Of the four major leagues in the US, the NFL has the strongest anti-doping program and the NHL the most lame, with the NBA and major league baseball in between.
The attitude in the NHL is that there is no need to do much more than the little it has for the past decade, even in the face of steroid abuse throughout the sporting landscape.
"We are fortunate not to have a problem with steroid use in our sport," said Ted Saskin, senior director of the NHL Players Association.
Bill Daly, the NHL's chief legal officer and executive vice president, offers a similar appraisal.
"It's certainly the opinion of our program doctors that we do not have an issue with steroid use in our sport," Daly said.
As evidence, Saskin and Daly point to the fact that none of the NHL players who participated in the Nagano and Salt Lake City Olympics ever tested positive for steroids.
That kind of thinking smacks of the head-in-the-sand syndrome that afflicted baseball until tests last year showed that dozens of players had used steroids.
Without random year-round tests, the NHL has no way of knowing what its players are doing between Olympics.
"The NHL absolutely, unequivocally needs a bona fide anti-doping program," said steroids expert and World Anti-Doping Agency consultant Dr. Gary Wadler. "I have a hard time believing that hockey is so unique it is virtually the only sport in the world that wouldn't have a drug issue."
An array of stimulants and anabolic steroids would be attractive to hockey players, Wadler says.
"I'm not aware of a single sport where one drug or another may not have some advantage," he said. "To suggest that the NHL is immune to problems of performance-enhancing drug abuse borders on the absurd."
No one is saying that the NHL has a steroid problem. And without testing, no one can say it doesn't.
"I shouldn't guess that, the fans shouldn't guess that, nobody should guess that," Wadler said. "It's not a matter for people to speculate. It's what we need to know."
The league ought to look into whether stimulants or steroids are feeding into the fighting in games. Did they play any role in Todd Bertuzzi's vicious attack recently that sent Colorado's Steve Moore to the hospital with a broken neck, concussion and other injuries? That wasn't the first time Bertuzzi attacked a player.
"There's no question when there's physicality and very aggressive behavior in sport, you have to at least have the question go through your mind about anabolic steroids," Wadler says. "Because clearly one of the things that anabolic steroids do is make you more aggressive."
If 'roid rage and hair-trigger tempers intensified by stimulants are contributing to the fighting, the NHL wouldn't have a clue without testing.
RSS