While public opinion is regarded as important to the movement against the death penalty, it is a small group of judges who have the authority to decide whether or not to apply capital punishment.
One thing that worries the abolitionists is the standards the judges adopt when determining whether someone deserves a death sentence. For all the arguments the supporters and foes of capital punishment have made, moral grounds are a crucial issue.
"In determining application of laws, the judges can be very rational and professional. But when it comes to sentencing, they are no more rational than ordinary peo-ple, who often make judgments based on moral grounds," said District Court Judge Chen Chih-hsiang (
Chen, an abolitionist, said he refuses to apply capital punishment because "taking a life is no different than murder," whether it is permitted by law or not. He said, however, that many other judges support the death penalty and think they are serving a good cause when handing down a death sentence.
"The issue of life and death is rarely a concern because it's not a subject of law school education or exams. To them, murderers, drug traffickers or kidnappers alike are savage criminals and should be executed because they deserve it," Chen said.
He said he once asked a colleague why she gave a death sentenced against an abductor, who did not hurt the abducted child at all.
"She said to me: `He is so bad. He took away the kid and asked for millions in ransom. He deserves that.' Sadly, it tells the way many other judges use the death penalty too," Chen said.
For centuries, retribution and the deterrence arguments have been central to support for capital punishment. In fact, these are also major arguments held by the judges, who think death is a once-and-for-all solution.
"To protect the general public and maintain social order, and to remedy the pain and trauma relatives of the murder victim have endured, it is necessary to remove the offender from society permanently," a Taipei District Court judge reasoned in giving a death sentence to a robber and murderer.
Such is a typical reason for giving a death sentence despite the argument of the abolitionists that life incarceration can also serve the purpose to permanently remove the offenders from the society.
As a matter of fact, in cases where a sentence is reviewed by a higher court, judges' decisions at times contradict each other. For instance, in a recent kidnapping case, the Taiwan High Court reversed a district court's death sentence and put the offender in prison for life because the high court judges felt life imprisonment was sufficient for the crime, which did not involve the taking of a life. The choice between life imprisonment and the death penalty is subject to the judges' discretion.
"As I see it, the judges are no different than the executioners, except that they execute with a pen," said Lee Mao-sheng (
"They might claim to have a good reason for ordering the execution, but I believe none of them would take pride in what they have done."
"So I always think it is these judges, not the general public, who should be subjects of the campaign for abolishing capital punishment. If we're able to stop the thousands of judges from handing out death sentences, we'll have the death penalty abolished in practice," Lee said.
Between 1991 and 2001, according to the Ministry of Justice, 281 people were executed on charges of homicide, sexual offenses, robbery, kidnapping and drug trafficking. There has been criticism that capital punishment is imposed for non-homicide offenses. The fact that the death penalty is mandatory for as many as 65 different offences is criticized as well.
Of the 281 executions in the past 10 years, 137 were carried out under the Act for the Control and Punishment of Banditry, generally known as the "bandit law."
Created in 1944, the bandit law is notorious for applying a mandatory death sentence for a wide range of crimes. In 1999, it was discovered the act, to which a so-called "sunset clause" had been attached, was extended under questionable procedure. In the wake of disputes over the validity of the act, the Ministry of Justice decided to abolish it, and the revocation of the act is now pending a review by the legislature.
However, a mandatory death sentence remains in other statutes other than the bandit law, which continues to restrict the judges' option in sentencing. The Council of Grand Justices has held that a mandatory death sentence is constitutional in its three interpretations between 1985 and 1998 despite the challenge that it violates the right to life and the principle of proportionality.
ROLLER-COASTER RIDE: More than five earthquakes ranging from magnitude 4.4 to 5.5 on the Richter scale shook eastern Taiwan in rapid succession yesterday afternoon Back-to-back weather fronts are forecast to hit Taiwan this week, resulting in rain across the nation in the coming days, the Central Weather Administration said yesterday, as it also warned residents in mountainous regions to be wary of landslides and rockfalls. As the first front approached, sporadic rainfall began in central and northern parts of Taiwan yesterday, the agency said, adding that rain is forecast to intensify in those regions today, while brief showers would also affect other parts of the nation. A second weather system is forecast to arrive on Thursday, bringing additional rain to the whole nation until Sunday, it
LANDSLIDES POSSIBLE: The agency advised the public to avoid visiting mountainous regions due to more expected aftershocks and rainfall from a series of weather fronts A series of earthquakes over the past few days were likely aftershocks of the April 3 earthquake in Hualien County, with further aftershocks to be expected for up to a year, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. Based on the nation’s experience after the quake on Sept. 21, 1999, more aftershocks are possible over the next six months to a year, the agency said. A total of 103 earthquakes of magnitude 4 on the local magnitude scale or higher hit Hualien County from 5:08pm on Monday to 10:27am yesterday, with 27 of them exceeding magnitude 5. They included two, of magnitude
CONDITIONAL: The PRC imposes secret requirements that the funding it provides cannot be spent in states with diplomatic relations with Taiwan, Emma Reilly said China has been bribing UN officials to obtain “special benefits” and to block funding from countries that have diplomatic ties with Taiwan, a former UN employee told the British House of Commons on Tuesday. At a House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee hearing into “international relations within the multilateral system,” former Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) employee Emma Reilly said in a written statement that “Beijing paid bribes to the two successive Presidents of the [UN] General Assembly” during the two-year negotiation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Another way China exercises influence within the UN Secretariat is
Taiwan’s first drag queen to compete on the internationally acclaimed RuPaul’s Drag Race, Nymphia Wind (妮妃雅), was on Friday crowned the “Next Drag Superstar.” Dressed in a sparkling banana dress, Nymphia Wind swept onto the stage for the final, and stole the show. “Taiwan this is for you,” she said right after show host RuPaul announced her as the winner. “To those who feel like they don’t belong, just remember to live fearlessly and to live their truth,” she said on stage. One of the frontrunners for the past 15 episodes, the 28-year-old breezed through to the final after weeks of showcasing her unique