Fifty-three years on, the events surrounding the 228 Incident of February 1947 still poison Taiwan's ethnic harmony.
The clash was primarily between mainlanders coming across from China in the aftermath of WWII and Taiwanese, whose ancestors had settled in Taiwan during earlier waves of migration.
A museum has been built as have memorials all over the island to commemorate the people who were killed or went missing during the violence of the events, but reconciliation still proves elusive.
"If the public and the government see the 228 Incident as only a commemoration rather than as a starting point for the review of Taiwan's history, we will never learn the lessons [the event has to teach]," said National Taiwan University (NTU) historian Li Yung-chih (李永熾).
Facing up to history
Files referring to the 228 Incident were not released by the government until 1993 when the first official report -- A Research Report on 228 Incident (二二八事件研究報告), written by five historians -- was issued.
Some historians said that the report, which outlined the events that took place, was just the beginning.
"In terms of history, I don't think the government review was sufficiently careful," said Li, adding that a sense of "right and wrong" and the lessons the event might teach future generations were missing in the document.
However, the authors of the official report believe that the moral dimension is superfluous, saying that people make progress by learning from their mistakes.
"Since the government has apologized to victims' families, the priority for us now should be to eliminate the misunderstanding left by the tragedy between the two groups -- mainlanders and Taiwanese," said Huang Fu-san (黃富三), historian from the Academia Sinica and co-author of the official report.
Mutual suspicion
Huang said that the 228 Incident could be attributed to the different living standards in China and Taiwan at the time.
"Taiwanese were disappointed by the undisciplined and lawless troops from China," said Huang, adding that Taiwanese had by then been schooled in honesty and civic virtue by the Japanese colonial government.
Huang said that the two groups, mainlanders and Taiwanese, had been inadvertantly hurting each other's interests when the 228 Incident burst out in 1947, and the military repression that followed resulted in more misunderstanding and conflict.
"Mainlanders had access to more resources because [government] policies favored them," said Huang. "This established the superiority of the migrant mainlanders over Taiwanese."
Huang said that it was understandable that some Taiwanese held a grudge against mainlanders.
"The loss of many key [government] files, such as those relating to the many intellectuals killed during the 228 Incident, has resulted in a strong distrust of both the government and mainlanders," Huang said.
Some historians say the mutual suspicion that exists between the two ethnic groups has become an obstacle to consensus on Taiwan's identity -- whether it should be an independent country or just a part of China -- and this has not helped harmony among groups living in Taiwan.
"When mainlanders, who feel insecure, don't trust Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) because of his Taiwanese background, some Taiwanese advocate Taiwan independence based on memories left by the 228 Incident and later the White Terror (白色恐怖, a witch-hunt for political dissidents)," said Huang.
RSS