Differences between cultures is often used to explain away international business disputes. While culture may play a part, Taiwan businesses are finding that in the international arena, companies are more than willing to play hardball when it comes to protecting themselves from industrial espionage, according to a number of legal professionals.
A US federal judge on Jan. 5 handed down sentences on two officials of the Taiwan-based Four Pillars Enterprise Ltd (
In addition, the judge has also ordered the company to pay the maximum fine allowable under the Economic Espionage Act -- US$5 million.
According to press reports in the US, Yang Pin-yen apologized for his actions immediately after being sentenced on Thursday. Officials of Four Pillars and the company's legal counsel in Taian, however, said the same day that accusations against the Yangs of attempting to steal trade secrets from the California-based adhesive manufacturer, Avery Dennison were false.
They claimed the Yangs' convictions under the Act could put all Taiwan businessmen who have formed -- or who are thinking of forming -- business relationships with US companies in danger.
The fear is that this is a test case of the Espionage Act and further prosecutions could be forthcoming.
The legal councilors said they believe that cultural differences had not been seriously taken into account during the judicial process.
"They don't understand the Eastern way of doing business," said Pun Jin-fang (
When Avery Dennison officials learned in 1996 that Victor Lee, a research engineer at the company, was passing company secrets to Four Pillars, they informed the FBI, who then arrested the engineer.
Lee later agreed to work undercover to help snare the Yangs. He lured them to a Cleveland hotel room and offered them confidential documents.
The FBI secretly videotaped the meeting between Lee and the Yangs, in which Sally Yang cut the stamp marked "confidential" off the documents. Her father then instructed Lee to dispose of the clipping, the tape showed.
The videotape thus became key evidence in the criminal case against the Yangs.
Pun argued, however, that simply watching the videotape of the incident does not tell the whole story.
"Do not forget Four Pillars and Avery Dennison had close contacts with each other for a period of seven years since 1987. The hotel meeting is just a small part of the whole story," Pun said.
Prior to the Yangs' arrest in 1997, another Taiwan company was caught under the Economic Espionage Act.
Both Taiwan nationals, Hsu Kai-lo (
Initially, Taxol required the use of the bark of the Pacific Yew tree, in which the active ingredient of Taxol occurs naturally. However, that tree has now been placed on the endangered species list and can no longer be harvested.
This promoted Bristol-Myers to spend several hundred million US dollars to develop a method of producing large quantities of Taxol through genetic engineering. The trade secrets in question relate to this substitute production process.
An FBI sting operation resulted in the arrest on June 14, 1997, of Hsu and Ho, with a Bristol-Myers executive posing as a corrupt in-house scientist willing to sell Taxol production secrets to the pair.
In fact, at no time did the defendants receive either the details of the secret production method or the cell lines used to grow Taxol cultures.
Prosecutors from the US Justice Department dropped the charges against Ho in January last year. Hsu, who pleaded guilty after exhausting all defense strategies, was put on a two-year supervised release and fined US$10,000 by the US District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania in July of the same year.
In February 1998, only months after the arrests of executives of the Yuen Foong Paper Company and of Four Pillars in 1997, another Taiwan company, Nan Ya Technology Corp (
Seoul-based Korea Semiconductor Technology Corp, a small IC design house that was co-developing DRAMs with Nan Ya Corp, allegedly stole memory technology from two local DRAM companies and transferred it to the Taiwan company.
Fortunately, Nan Ya was able to distance itself from the espionage charge by showing a contract it had previously signed with the South Korean company, which specially requested that it should not use confidential information from other companies or individuals.
From the two cases tried under the Economic Espionage Act to today's growing number of international disputes over industrial espionage, legal advisors said these cases have demonstrated a need for Taiwan businesses to take intellectual property rights seriously and to take cautious steps in the course of making technology transfers.
They believe, however, cultural differences, useful excuse as it might sometimes be, is not able to save the companies or individuals from legal actions taken against them by their international business competitors.
"The lesson Taiwan businessmen should learn from these cases is that there is no such thing as a free meal," said Wu Ching-yuan (
"They should either pay for what is given or make everything clear on paper about matters of technology transfer.
"Cultural differences are used as an excuse all the time. But after all, it is not as persuasive as concrete evidence, such as written documents," Wu said.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft