In addition, the judge was very critical of Avery Dennison's role in the Yangs' criminal prosecution, indicating he was troubled that the US company was such an "active participant" in the criminal proceedings.
The judge said he was suspicious that the real intent of Avery Dennison was to "enhance its ability to recoup losses" in its civil suit seeking millions in damages from Four Pillars and the Yangs.
He said Avery Dennison officials made this case look like a "dress rehearsal" for their civil case, which is scheduled for trial on Jan. 10 in the US District Court in Cleveland.
The Yangs -- both of whom have served two years confined to the US while awaiting trial -- will not be able to return to Taiwan together under the judge's order, which allows Sally Yang to return after paying her fine while her father must serve six-months of home confinement there.
In June of last year, when the Yangs were still being tried in the US court, officials at Four Pillars began legal action against Avery Dennison in court in Taiwan, accusing the US company of fraud and unfair competition. The trial is continuing.
Jointly interested in the Chinese adhesive label market, officials from Four Pillars and Avery Dennison had discussed forming a joint venture in 1987. However, the two companies fell out after seven years of close contacts. Both have accused each other of being dishonest during the long process of negotiations.
RSS