As expected, the Ministry of Finance announced on Monday that Taiwan’s total export value for last month dropped by 44.1 percent year-on-year. The NT dollar dropped NT$0.045 against the US dollar on Friday and another NT$0.211 on Monday. Recently, tycoon Winston Wang (王文洋) has suggested that it be devalued to NT$40, while others have suggested that it be devalued by 20 percent. Both suggestions hint at a similar value.
These suggestions to save the economy through a currency devaluation are a result of the current economic crisis, which is causing many companies to lose orders and which caused Taiwan’s exports for December to drop by 41.9 percent year-on-year. Another reason is that there were only 18 working days last month as a result of the Lunar New Year holiday, which led to a further drop in exports.
A devaluation could increase price competitiveness. In particular, the depreciation of the NT dollar over the past few months has been insignificant compared to that of the South Korean won. Although devaluation would be one way to regain market share, it would be a risky move.
More deliberation and further options for execution are therefore needed.
First, a devaluation would cause immediate price increases for imported goods and raw materials. Rising production costs and falling purchasing power would be a serious blow to the national economy and public wellbeing.
Next, complementary measures are necessary for companies to be able to benefit from a devaluation. Even if the prices of Taiwan-made products became more competitive, the question is whether Europe and the US would still be capable of importing them given the economic environment. In other words, there is no certainty that Taiwanese companies would receive more orders.
In the past, European and US importers used to demand price cuts when the cost of Taiwanese products decreased in foreign currency terms. Hence, for Taiwanese companies to make a profit, factors such as time and bargaining ability played an important role.
Finally, in any devaluation, the greatest worry is the “interest arbitrage” that can follow. Some may buy foreign currencies using NT dollars and profit from the exchange-rate difference after the devaluation by buying back the Taiwanese currency, thus causing pain to the central bank’s foreign reserves. To avoid this, the central bank would have to carry out a devaluation quietly and unexpectedly.
Besides, if the Taiwanese currency really were devalued, Taiwanese would not want it to lose its value for too long and would expect a rebound soon afterwards. However, once a consensus forms around the lower value, it will be very difficult for the currency to appreciate.
If government efforts manage to increase the exchange rate, speculative hot money — US dollars — could pour into the market to profit from exchange rate differences. The cost to the central bank would be incalculable.
An exchange rate policy is always a double-edged sword. Used well, it may conquer the market. Used badly, it can cause great trouble.
If Taiwan wants to save its exports through a currency devaluation, it must on the one hand respect market supply and demand to maintain its balance and, on the other, move swiftly to preclude speculation.
These are all factors that must be considered if one wants to control and manipulate the exchange rate.
Lin Chien-fu is a professor in the Department of Economics at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry