A possible security breach in South Korea on a leading US college entrance exam is highlighting a common but little-known practice by the College Board: reusing entire SAT exams that have already been given.
At least one student who took the exam on Jan. 27 had access to the questions ahead of time, according to the Educational Testing Service, which writes and administers the exam for the College Board and is investigating.
Actually, hundreds of thousands of people had already seen the test. The SAT exam administered worldwide on Jan. 27 was identical to the one given in the United States in December 2005.
PHOTO: EPA
However, the exam was not supposed to have been publicly available after that sitting. The Korean student appears to have seen a portion of the 2005 test without realizing it would be repeated, an ETS spokesman said.
The College Board has a long-standing practice of recycling not just individual questions but entire exams. Three tests administered in late 2004 and 2005, as the SAT was making the transition to its new format, were repeats from recent years, according to Steve Quattrociocchi, head of the test-prep division at The Princeton Review.
"In this environment, when everybody's talking on the Internet and taking test-prep ... you would think if they wanted to make the test as fresh and new and incorruptible as possible, they would release a new test every time,'' Quattrociocchi said.
Of the seven tests given each year, four are made publicly available afterward, ETS spokesman Tom Ewing said.
Those exams are never repeated. But the other three are candidates for reuse. ETS says test books are carefully collected after those exams. But since the recycling practice is well known in test-preparation circles, the questions on these exams are like gold to test-takers and tutors.
(AP)
一項主要的美國大學入學測驗在南韓疑似試題外流,揭露了美國大學委員會雖普遍卻鮮為人知的一項作法︰重複使用整份出過的考題。
為美國大學委員會出題並且舉辦測驗的美國教育測驗服務社表示,至少有一位參加一月二十七日測驗的學生在試前看過考題,美國教育測驗服務社正在調查。
事實上,成千上萬人早已看過這份考題,一月二十七日全球舉行的測試與二○○五年十二月在美國進行的考試一模一樣。
不過,這份試題不應該在測驗後讓民眾取得。ETS發言人表示,這名韓國學生顯然看過二○○五年的考題,卻不知道它會重複出現。
長久以來,美國大學委員會重複使用的不只是單一試題,也包括整份考題。普林斯頓留學考試輔導機構考試準備中心主任史蒂夫.夸卓希歐奇表示,ETS在二○○四年底到二○○五年這段換新題型的過度時期時,舉辦的三次考試試題都是重複近年來的考題。
夸卓希歐奇表示︰「在這種大家會在網路聊天,談論準備考試的環境,你會覺得,如果他們盡可能要出新穎且不外流的考題,可能每次測驗都得重新出題。」
ETS發言人湯姆.艾溫表示,每年的七份考題中,有四份考題會在考後對外公開。
這四份試題絕對不會重複出現,其他三份卻可能重複使用,ETS表示,試題本都是從這些測驗精挑細選的內容。只是經年累月下來,試題重複使用的情況對準備考試的人早已眾所皆知,這些問題對應試者和教師來說就像黃金一樣。
(美聯社╱翻譯︰鄭湘儀)
The strongest earthquake to hit Taiwan in 25 years killed at least 16 people and damaged dozens of buildings, but the destruction was largely contained thanks to decades of preparedness work. Taiwan sits on the “Ring of Fire,” an arc of intense seismic activity along the Pacific Rim, and — much like neighboring Japan — has a long history of catastrophic quakes. How does April 3 compare with other recent quakes? The April 3 earthquake, which measured 7.4 on the moment magnitude scale, was felt across Taiwan. It was the most severe since a 7.6 magnitude quake in 1999 killed
Around the time of the Dragon Boat Festival in June, the streets of Taiwan are filled with the delightful aroma of zongzi, a traditional snack made of sticky rice wrapped in leaves. The leaves are folded into a cone and then filled with sticky rice and other ingredients such as braised pork belly, peanuts and salted duck egg yolks. The filled leaves are then tightly tied with kitchen twine and ready for cooking. 每到六月端午時節,街頭巷尾就會飄出粽子的香氣。粽子是將糯米包進粽葉的傳統美食,先將粽葉折成圓錐狀塞入糯米,以及紅燒肉、花生、鹹鴨蛋黃等配料,用棉線綁緊後即可烹煮。 Dragon Boat Festival (n. phr.) 端午節 aroma
Everyone has seen a piece of fruit turn brown after being cut. Have you ever wondered why that happens? It is a common phenomenon that occurs due to a chemical reaction called enzymatic browning. The appearance, flavor and nutritional value of the fruit are all affected by this reaction. Some fruits, such as apples, pears, bananas, avocados and peaches, are more prone to enzymatic browning than others. These fruits contain high levels of an enzyme called polyphenol oxidase, or PPO for short. __1__ This causes a chain of chemical reactions that ultimately transforms the phenolic compounds into
A: Artificial intelligence technology has been causing controversy lately: a student was caught cheating with AI to win the grand prize in an art contest. B: That’s so absurd. Does this mean that AI paints better than humans? A: Maybe. Luckily, the student was later disqualified. B: And more absurdly, it’s becoming more and more popular to use AI technology to “resurrect” people. A: Yeah, some netizens even posted videos featuring the late singer CoCo Lee, who was “resurrected” by them with AI software. A: 人工智慧的爭議不斷,有學生違規使用AI參加美術展,甚至贏得首獎。 B: 真誇張,這是不是代表AI比人類還強大? A: 或許吧,幸好得獎資格被取消。 B: 還有更誇張的︰讓死者重現的「AI復活」技術越來越熱門。 A: 對啊,還有網友製作已故歌后李玟「復活」的影片呢! (By Eddy Chang, Taipei Times/台北時報張聖恩)