For more than a decade, the US Central Intelligence Agency and the Pentagon have tried to develop plans to divide and crack the government of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.
During the first days of the war, those plans have not gone as well as some intelligence officials envisioned, despite some successful recruiting of human intelligence sources close to the Iraqi leader and a host of high-technology efforts that have helped prepare the battlefield.
Setbacks, including the apparent failure to kill Saddam on the first night of the war or to cut off communications between the leadership and its forces, have also revived simmering tensions between the CIA and the Pentagon.
Optimism about the fragility of Saddam's government was shared by policymakers at the White House, the Pentagon and even within the CIA, though some longtime intelligence analysts say they had warned of the stiff opposition US forces might face.
Senior officials now acknowl-edge that few Iraqis in the leader-ship, the military or even in towns and villages seem prepared to resist Saddam's rule of terror until they are certain he is really dead or driven from power.
"This is the head-of-the-snake conundrum," said one senior official who was deeply involved in the planning for a post-Saddam Iraq.
"No one wants to commit themselves until it is clear regime change is happening," the official said.
The CIA and Special Operations forces are playing crucial roles in the war, both on the battlefield and in ongoing efforts to disrupt Saddam's leadership.
However, the CIA's role is markedly different than it was during the war in Afghanistan after Sept. 11, 2001, in part because American intelligence has had many years to gather on-the-ground information about Iraq since the first Gulf War, in part because US intelligence has had many years to assemble on the ground information about Iraq.
Using e-mail messages and cell phones, American intelligence and military officials have kept up efforts to persuade Saddam's inner circle to defect, recruiting family members, college classmates and even overseas business associates of Iraq's top officials in the effort, government officials said.
Individual military intelligence officers, with the help of the National Security Agency, prepared files on Iraqi officers identified for some of these communications. Military planners have spared portions of Iraq's telephone and communications networks from the bombing so that it can be used as part of this program to undermine Saddam's regime.
Meanwhile, new intelligence collected by the FBI from Iraqis questioned in the US about where Iraqi leaders may be hiding, as well as which buildings have been "masked" as cover for military operations, has been sent to the Pentagon to aid in the war, officials said Tuesday.
The CIA has already set up a Baghdad station outside of Iraq -- awaiting only a final order to move into Iraq, officials said.
A series of Special Operations missions undertaken in the early hours of the war to destroy communications and observation positions that intelligence reports said were vital Saddam's ability to command Iraq's military forces apparently succeeded in severely eroding Baghdad's ability to communicate with its main military commanders.
However, the Iraqi leadership's ability to communicate has not been totally shattered.
"No doubt there is still some command-and-control," said one senior Pentagon official with access to the daily bomb damage reports.
"We don't know if it's enough to orchestrate a really effective defense of Baghdad," the official said.
Now that the war has begun, the role played by the CIA in Iraq is much different than the role it played in Afghanistan.
In Afghanistan, the CIA played a crucial role in linking up small groups of American special forces with local tribal warlords with whom the CIA already had developed relationships.
By contrast, the US military has had extensive experience with Iraq and the Persian Gulf, and doesn't need to rely on the CIA to go in first and develop relationships on the ground, officials said.
As a result, the CIA's role in Iraq is a hybrid, a combination of the small-unit, paramilitary campaign that agency officers were involved in Afghanistan, and the more traditional intelligence military support.
The CIA has already sent in small numbers of officers into Iraq to work with Special Operations units.
In addition to its paramilitary activities, the CIA is helping support the conventional forces in the land and air battles in southern and central Iraq, including providing intelligence for targeting for bombing raids and information about the whereabouts of the Iraqi leadership.
But at least in the opening phases of the war, the CIA is not directly involved with special forces in the hunt for chemical or biological weapons inside Iraq. That task has been taken up by the military as well as other organizations, officials said.
The targeting of the Iraqi leadership is a major focus of the CIA. Before the war began, the CIA generated lists of Iraqi leaders close to Saddam who should be detained by American forces. Officials said that a "couple hundred" Iraqi leaders were included on the list.
Meanwhile, the agency had developed at least one human source close to Saddam who was able to disclose the Iraqi leader's location for US bombing a week ago.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source