Civilian casualties are unavoidable in war, and this one is no exception.
"People are going to die," General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said this month before the invasion of Iraq began, preparing the public for some of the consequences of the campaign.
That is the reality despite intense efforts to avoid civilian deaths. Compared with much of the world, the US military is vigilant about training its soldiers on the rules of war and the importance of avoiding needless civilian deaths. The Defense Department's lawyers are constantly consulted about military strategy and targets when time permits; and the military has invested huge resources in developing precision-guided weapons to reduce the loss of innocent life.
"It's an embedded and intrinsic part of American military culture, post-Vietnam," said William Arkin, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic Education at Johns Hopkins University and senior military adviser to Human Rights Watch.
Still, civilian casualties inevitably bring anguish and outcries. That is particularly true now, when war's face can be instantaneously broadcast and magnified to millions all over the globe. Indeed, there was even discussion of charging NATO officials with war crimes for the 1999 bombing of Kosovo, which killed about 500 civilians, although justified on humanitarian grounds. (The charges, brought before the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, were ultimately dropped by prosecutors.)
The 20th century's experience with war has produced a web of international treaties setting out detailed rules of armed conflict. When it comes to non-combatants, there are two overarching principles that everyone seems to agree on.
The first is that the military can't intentionally make targets of civilians. The second is that if commanders know that striking a legitimate military target will kill civilians, causing so-called collateral damage, they must weigh the importance of the military target against the loss of civilian lives.
Just how to interpret those principles, though, and how to weigh the loss of civilian life against other factors, like the lives of American soldiers or the success of the entire military campaign itself, is vigorously debated.
The divisions have become so severe that over the past two years, the Carr Center for the Study of Human Rights Policy at Harvard has sponsored a project that brings together representatives from the military, international lawyers and human rights groups to consider each other's vastly different legal interpretations.
"The human-rights community is absolutist at its core," said Sarah Sewall, program director at the Carr Center and former deputy assistant secretary of defense for peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance in the Clinton administration. "From a military mind-set, civilian casualties are one of the trade-offs."
She added, "It's inherently more complex than the human-rights community approaches it."
The most widely accepted rules derive from the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, which govern a range of humanitarian issues arising in wartime, from aiming at civilians to the treatment of prisoners of war.
In 1977, protocols were added to elaborate on the conventions, and that's where bitter disagreements have arisen, particularly with the Americans. (Although more than 150 nations have ratified the protocols, the US has not.)
"It isn't like there's one set of rules," said Ken Anderson, a law professor at American University who has written widely about the rules of armed conflict.
Beijing’s continued provocations in the Taiwan Strait reveal its intention to unilaterally change the “status quo” in the area, the US Department of State said on Saturday, calling for a peaceful resolution to cross-strait issues. The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) reported that four China Coast Guard patrol vessels entered restricted and prohibited waters near Kinmen County on Friday and again on Saturday. A State Department spokesperson said that Washington was aware of the incidents, and urged all parties to exercise restraint and refrain from unilaterally changing the “status quo.” “Maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait is in line with our [the
EXTENDED RANGE: Hsiung Sheng missiles, 100 of which might be deployed by the end of the year, could reach Chinese command posts and airport runways, a source said A NT$16.9 billion (US$534.93 million) project to upgrade the military’s missile defense systems would be completed this year, allowing the deployment of at least 100 long-range Hsiung Sheng missiles and providing more deterrence against China, military sources said on Saturday. Hsiung Sheng missiles are an extended-range version of the Hsiung Feng IIE (HF-2E) surface-to-surface cruise missile, and are believed to have a range of up to 1,200km, which would allow them to hit targets well inside China. They went into mass production in 2022, the sources said. The project is part of a special budget for the Ministry of National Defense aimed at
READY TO WORK: Taiwan is eager to cooperate and is hopeful that like-minded states will continue to advocate for its inclusion in regional organizations, Lai said Maintaining the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait, and peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region must be a top priority, president-elect William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday after meeting with a delegation of US academics. Leaders of the G7, US President Joe Biden and other international heads of state have voiced concerns about the situation in the Strait, as stability in the region is necessary for a safe, peaceful and prosperous world, Lai said. The vice president, who is to be inaugurated in May, welcomed the delegation and thanked them for their support for Taiwan and issues concerning the Strait. The international community
COOPERATION: Two crewmembers from a Chinese fishing boat that sank off Kinmen were rescued, two were found dead and another two were still missing at press time The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) was yesterday working with Chinese rescuers to find two missing crewmembers from a Chinese fishing boat that sank southwest of Kinmen County yesterday, killing two crew. The joint operation managed to rescue two of the boat’s six crewmembers, but two were already dead when they were pulled from the water, the agency said in a statement. Rescuers are still searching for two others from the Min Long Yu 61222, a boat registered in China’s Fujian Province that capsized and sank 1.03 nautical miles (1.9km) southwest of Dongding Island (東碇), it added. CGA Director-General Chou Mei-wu (周美伍) told a