Only history will relate, and even then haphazardly, what really happened at the heart of the US government on Tuesday as it faced its greatest crisis of all time. We may never know how President George W. Bush actually responded away from the TV cameras to a day of disaster that will rank in American infamy close to Dallas and Pearl Harbor, a day that may for a long time render the Hollywood catastrophe movie redundant.
Sustained by bewilderment and ignorance of the scale of the devastation the people of Washington, and apparently New York, reacted with impressive calm. But between the top and bottom of society there was evidence of panic-stricken decision making from officials who have simply no experience not merely of terrorism on this scale but of anything remotely like it.
It is hard for outsiders to grasp just how calm and structured day-to-day life is for most Americans. Our images come from TV and films, which by their make-up emphasize lawlessness. Our perceptions come from newspaper stories of occasional horrific and wacky murders.
Our own memories come from visiting tourist areas, which by their nature attract criminals. This tells us nothing about the work/family/car/TV/shopping mall existence of people, a way of life that has seemed wholly invincible.
In many respects this is a strikingly more relaxed society than Britain. At home, people are more likely to know their neighbors, leave their doors unlocked, tell the delivery men to dump the stuff on the porch. Obviously, that old-fashioned confidence primarily belongs to the white middle class. But even on the streets, closed circuit TV -- far from being the ubiquitous supposed boon of British cities -- is barely even a rumor.
Visitors who do nothing stupid are less likely to feel threatened on the streets of Washington than in the center of London. It is this background that has enabled the people -- and their politicians -- to shrug off scares of global warming and environmental meltdown. This is America. What can harm us?
Above all, there is no experience of terrorism. Except for the two major operations on the original World Trade Center attack in 1993 and the Oklahoma City bomb of 1995, this kind of attack has been confined mainly to "abroad," that strange and mystical place little experienced by most Americans, including their president. Even when Americans have been targeted, it has usually happened in faraway places with strange-sounding names such as Beirut or Dar-es-Salaam, reinforcing the popular instinct that this is the only safe and sensible country in the world, a place where the greatest terror is poison ivy at summer camp. It is an instinct that traditionally leads on to political isolationism.
In America you can still -- or you could until yesterday -- put a bag in a locker at a bus or railway station without anyone presuming that there might be a bomb inside and demanding the right to check.
This right disappeared from Britain and Europe in the early 1970s, when bombings and hijacking became a commonplace of our lives.
Airport inspections, though theoretically efficient, have become perfunctory and routine in a country where thousands and thousands of planes land uneventfully every day.
Countless opponents of the president's missile defense programme have pointed out the futility of spending billions of dollars trying to anticipate the direction of a nuclear attack when a carbomb, a suitcase, or a lone maniac can cause any amount of havoc. No one can have anticipated the real potential of a few hijacked planes; even so there will be widespread grim satisfaction of a kind among George Bush's opponents today. But it is necessary to understand the illusion of security that Americans had enjoyed which has made the fantasy of total safety so politically potent.
In his second televised address after the disasters, the president intoned: "We have taken all appropriate security precautions to protect the American people." Never has a politician's bromide sounded so ludicrously hollow. This is a huge country; it cannot secure its one sensitive land frontier to keep out illegal immigrants; it cannot secure its coasts to keep out shiploads of illegal drugs. In the modern world, against ruthless, determined and invisible opposition, protection is an impossible ideal. And until now, it has never seemed remotely necessary.
A spokesman travelling with the president may have given the game away when he listed the two priorities of the day:
-- The president's safety;
-- Getting him back to Washington to reassure the American people.
This information was vouchsafed via CNN from an undisclosed military base, seemingly a long way from Washington. There were also reports that congressional leaders had been taken away to a secret location. As displays of courageous leadership go, none of this ranks with standing on a tank in the streets of Moscow or even remaining in Buckingham Palace throughout the blitz.
It was the junior officials who control so much of America who most needed reassurance. By mid morning it was not only the White House and the state department that had been evacuated. All the office buildings close to either the geographic or actual heart of the federal government had been evacuated.
This included obvious secondary targets such as the FBI building -- though one trusts that the anti-terrorism section had not been sent home -- as well as such improbably sites as Borders bookshop and Quizno's sandwich shop. Only the Bombay Club restaurant, with Asian fatalism, deemed to be ignoring official pressure and carrying on as normal. As people rushed to the car parks to try to get out of town, every street close to the White House became hopelessly gridlocked: half a block in half an hour became the norm. It would have taken a huge effort for the president to reach home even if he had decided to come.
The response was too confused to be called phlegmatic. With the Washington metro shut down, crocodiles of office workers set out on a hot day to start out what might be a long walk home. Anyone with a mobile phone tried frantically, and nearly always unsuccessfully, to dial someone, anyone. The shrewd ones sat in the sunshine and waited for the facts and the streets to become clearer. Knots of people formed on street corners close to anyone who had a portable TV or a radio set. "Oh my God," said one young woman as she watched the World Trade Center fall. "Oh my God."
For the most part no one knew what was happening, never mind why. The media fed in misinformation and absurd irrelevancies. There was a bomb at the Capitol, we were told, yet it still stood, glinting under glorious skies. One Washington all-news radio station had a long discussion about the likely consequences for the stock markets.
That, frankly, is for another day. The most awful consequences affect those who have lost loved ones. For America at large the most awful consequence is nothing to do with the Dow, nothing to do with President George Bush, nothing to do with his facile promises "to hunt down and punish those responsible," nothing to do with missile defense.
To an extent unknown for at least one generation and may be two, the US' faith in itself has been shattered. That will end a certain amount of smug self-satisfaction. But it also endangers the wonderfully secure routine of the lives of the people.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft