What does the future hold for US trade policy? That's no easy question to answer. While the major presidential candidates have been gleefully bashing each other over Medicare, Internet taxes, and what do with the budget surplus, they have been conspicuously silent about important trade issues.
That silence contrasts sharply with the popular media buzz. Last December's Seattle mayhem spawned countless US editorials and commentary columns debating the merits of free trade, globalization, and the World Trade Organization. Pundits continue to fill the airwaves with dire warnings of a "backlash against trade."
The future American president will hold enormous sway over the direction of US trade policy, so it's critical to know where he stands. But there has been nary a peep over trade matters during the recent presidential debates. Should we conclude that all of the candidates agree?
Not necessarily. True, there is a general consensus among presidential aspirants that "trade is good." However, the leading candidates differ on specifics, most notably on the need to link trade to labor and environmental standards.
First, the good news: it's exceedingly unlikely that an administration headed by one of the four major candidates -- George W. Bush Jr., John McCain, Al Gore or Bill Bradley -- would lead to a major reorientation of US trade policy. Only Reform party candidate Pat Buchanan has promised to put an anti-trade agenda at the top of his list of priorities. Buchanan's chances of success, however, are slim.
But even seemingly small changes to US trade policy could lead to difficulties down the road. The most troubling rhetoric in this regard has come from Democratic frontrunner Al Gore, who is desperately seeking a way to avoid antagonizing organized labor before the November elections. The AFL-CIO, America's largest labor union, has made fighting new trade initiatives its top priority. Indeed, AFL-CIO president John Sweeney recently threatened to "do whatever it takes" to block permanent NTR for China.
Gore needn't worry; anti-trade democrats really don't have anyplace to go. Gore's only challenger for the Democratic nomination, Bill Bradley, is a self-styled free trader. Green candidates will never be taken seriously. And to back Pat Buchanan would be to back a relatively high-profile loser, effectively handing the presidency to a pro-trade Republican such as Bush or McCain. Since Gore is the only candidate likely to support at least marginally protectionist union-backed legislation, he can pretty much count on their support at the end of the day.
Moreover, many union members work in export sectors and generally support open trade. And nearly half of America's 17 million union members are employed in the public sector and thus largely immune from import pressures. The numbers speak for themselves: organized labor is giving far more to Gore than any other candidate.
Bill Bradley has also been sounding a bit more protectionist these days, but like Gore, his "get tough" stance would likely morph into Clinton-style internationalism if he were elected. Bradley was a key advocate of both the WTO and the North American Free Trade Agreement. And he continuities to praise globalization, which he credits with "expanding the economy" through trade. Realistically, however, a Bradley win looks highly improbable at this point.
Bush is still the favorite for the Republican nomination, and he has been a highly vocal supporter of free trade. In fact, he has regularly chastised Gore, his likely Democratic opponent, for not taking a stronger public stand against the radical anti-WTO protests in Seattle. "He's worried about the political implications," said Bush of Gore's reluctance to speak out. Bush has been a particularly strong supporter of granting permanent normal trade relations to China -- an important step in that nation's quest to join the WTO.
McCain is also a vocal proponent of trade liberalization and boasts a strong pro-trade voting record in the Senate. In fact, a 1999 Cato Institute study of the 105th Congress ranked McCain as one of only 12 consistently free-trade Senators. McCain supports China's entry into the WTO and has repeatedly argued that trade ties be-tween the United States and China exert a positive influence on China's Communist leaders.
Of course, not all Republicans agree on trade. China in particular seems to separate the conservative frontrunners from the longshots. Millionaire publisher Steve Forbes, former Reagan advisor Gary Bauer and Republican party defector Pat Buchanan have all said that China shouldn't be allowed into the WTO. Some go even further: Bauer calls China an "international human rights pariah, disqualified for trade privileges with the US."
The Democratic candidates appear to be less divided over China. When asked recently by the Associated Press about China, both candidates declared their support for permanent normal trade relations. The tone of their answers, however, was telling. Bradley rightly stressed the benefits of trade to American companies and its potential to encourage democratic reform in China. Gore, on the other hand, spoke mostly of the "safeguards" that would protect American businesses from Chinese imports -- hardly a ringing endorsement of free trade.
A Bush or McCain presidency would be good news for free traders, but what of the most likely alternative: a Gore administration? Gore increasingly stresses the need to balance trade growth with stronger labor and environmental protections on an uncomfortably regular basis. Pursued properly trade policy, he says, will pay "more attention to labor rights and environmental protection than we have in the past."
He seems to believe what he's saying, which could lead to a retreat from US support for liberalized trade. It already looks as if President Clinton deliberately allowed the WTO's Seattle meeting to collapse in order to avoid alienating Gore supporters. If true, Gore almost certainly had a hand in the decision.
It's not clear whether Gore truly understands the implications of pursuing a "fairer" trade strategy. Without doubt, developing countries will rightly rebel against any move to undercut their number one competitive advantage: low wages. President Clinton merely hinted that the US might favor imposing sanctions on countries that fail to live up to labor standards and it was enough to topple the WTO's Seattle ministerial meeting. If a Gore administration were foolish enough to forcefully pursue such a policy, any future trade agreements would inevitably be stillborn. Labor standards tied to trade sanctions might make some American unions happy, but would be a terrible blow to the world's poorest workers.
One hopes, of course, that Gore would put the welfare of those impoverished masses ahead of his own political ambitions. For most developing countries, open trade offers the best hope of salvation. Unfortunately, Gore is making unwise promises he may eventually be forced to keep.
Aaron Lukas is an analyst at the Cato Institute's Center for Trade Policy Studies in Washington, DC.
ROLLER-COASTER RIDE: More than five earthquakes ranging from magnitude 4.4 to 5.5 on the Richter scale shook eastern Taiwan in rapid succession yesterday afternoon Back-to-back weather fronts are forecast to hit Taiwan this week, resulting in rain across the nation in the coming days, the Central Weather Administration said yesterday, as it also warned residents in mountainous regions to be wary of landslides and rockfalls. As the first front approached, sporadic rainfall began in central and northern parts of Taiwan yesterday, the agency said, adding that rain is forecast to intensify in those regions today, while brief showers would also affect other parts of the nation. A second weather system is forecast to arrive on Thursday, bringing additional rain to the whole nation until Sunday, it
CONDITIONAL: The PRC imposes secret requirements that the funding it provides cannot be spent in states with diplomatic relations with Taiwan, Emma Reilly said China has been bribing UN officials to obtain “special benefits” and to block funding from countries that have diplomatic ties with Taiwan, a former UN employee told the British House of Commons on Tuesday. At a House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee hearing into “international relations within the multilateral system,” former Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) employee Emma Reilly said in a written statement that “Beijing paid bribes to the two successive Presidents of the [UN] General Assembly” during the two-year negotiation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Another way China exercises influence within the UN Secretariat is
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
Taiwan’s first drag queen to compete on the internationally acclaimed RuPaul’s Drag Race, Nymphia Wind (妮妃雅), was on Friday crowned the “Next Drag Superstar.” Dressed in a sparkling banana dress, Nymphia Wind swept onto the stage for the final, and stole the show. “Taiwan this is for you,” she said right after show host RuPaul announced her as the winner. “To those who feel like they don’t belong, just remember to live fearlessly and to live their truth,” she said on stage. One of the frontrunners for the past 15 episodes, the 28-year-old breezed through to the final after weeks of showcasing her unique