Wed, Apr 22, 2015 - Page 1 News List

Military punishment laws amended

By Alison Hsiao  /  Staff reporter

Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng strikes his gavel to signal the passage of the third reading of proposed amendments to the Punishment Act of the Armed Forces at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday.

Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times

Amendments to the Punishment Act of the Armed Forces (陸海空軍懲罰法) that were proposed after the death in 2013 of army corporal Hung Chung-chiu (洪仲丘), who is said to have died from abuse while serving in the military, yesterday cleared the legislature, including a stipulation to end the practice of confinement to “detention barracks.”

The punishment of confining soldiers to detention barracks has been changed to requiring them to “repent,” and the maximum period of penitence that a soldier could be subjected to has been revised from 30 days to 15 days.

The penitence would be conducted in a “penitence room,” the establishment of which has been stipulated to fall within the Ministry of National Defense’s remit. Other responsibilities to be taken over by the ministry include the definition of educational content to be delivered to repenting soldiers, and the qualifications and accountability of the personnel managing the penitence rooms.

According to the newly amended act, those who are disciplined through measures involving restraints of their personal freedom can appeal to a court or the authority in charge of the punishment in a written document or oral statement. The court, upon receiving the protest, would immediately inform the disciplinary unit, which would then review the appeal within 24 hours and retract or annul the punishment if the protest is found to be justified or penitence is deemed unnecessary.

The categories of disciplinary measures have been broadened, with ranking officers now also subject to reductions in rank; non-commissioned officers to dismissal, reduction in rank and restrictions; and enlisted personnel to forfeiture of pay.

“Reforming training” as one of the possible punishments for non-commissioned officers and enlisted personnel has been scrapped.

Other changes include making sexual harassment, sexual assault and sexual bullying punishable offenses, as well as driving under the influence of alcohol or without a license.

Hung Tzu-yung (洪慈庸), Hung Chung-chiu’s older sister and one of the New Power Party’s legislative candidates, said on Facebook that, while she is glad to see the attempts of the ministry and the legislature to better the human rights situation in the military, she still holds misgivings about part of the revision.

“Changing ‘detention’ to ‘penitence’ will be putting old wine in new bottles if the environment of penitence as a kind of punishment does not improve. Soldiers who are disciplined could still be abused by the disciplinary environment or personnel during the penitence period,” Hung Tzu-yung said. “Hung Chung-chiu was put in a penitence room that was worse than detention barracks.”

She added that, although the right to appeal has been granted to officers and enlisted personnel by the amendments, “because of the military’s culture, those who have been punished would not dare lodge a claim, even if they felt the punishment was unreasonable.”

“It is not enough to simply have a legal framework established. The government also needs to make sure that individuals can protest without adverse consequences, otherwise the amendment is an empty promise,” Hung Tzu-yung said.

The military was stripped of its right to prosecute its personnel during peacetime by the legislature in August 2013, soon after Hung Chung-chiu’s death and a subsequent mass protest by tens of thousands of people.

This story has been viewed 1754 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top