Shih Hsin University professor Wang Hsiao-po (王曉波), who also served as the convener of the Ministry of Education’s curriculum adjustment task force, yesterday said that the killing of 20,000 people by former president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) Nationalist military in the 228 Massacre was “a small case” compared with the 400,000 killed during Chiang’s purges in China.
Wang made the remarks in response to a question from the audience at a forum hosted by the pro-unification Cross-Strait Peace Development Forum to commemorate the 67th anniversary of the 228 Massacre.
“Chiang started killing his opponents in China, not in Taiwan. The Chinese government estimated Chiang had put to death over 400,000 people during the ‘communist purges’ in China [during the 1920s],” Wang said.
Photo: Chen Wei-min, Taipei Times
“Families of Taiwan’s 228 victims said the total people killed by the KMT troops was around 20,000. So when you compare 400,000 to 20,000, what we have here is a small case,” he said.
Wang, born in China in 1943, said the 228 Incident was not a conflict between Taiwanese and Mainlanders, but of oppressed people rising up against oppressors.
“Why did the Nationalist military go on an arbitrary arrest and killing spree of Taiwanese? That was because you opposed the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] government,” he said. “When Mainlanders escaped to Taiwan in 1949, their leadership regime was the KMT government. At the time, whomever the government branded a communist had to be killed. So the 228 Incident resulted from the Chinese Civil War.”
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Cheng Li-chun (鄭麗君) condemned Wang’s remarks.
“He is trampling on people’s rights, and adding more hurt and insult to [228 Massacre] victims and their families,” she said. “How can such a person be qualified to head up the committee to adjust school curriculum guidelines, which has a wide and extensive influence on students’ right to education?”
“China has such a large population, where as Taiwan has a much smaller population. Does Wang Hsiao-po think that killing 20,000 people was not enough?” DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said.
“Wang has no concept of human rights, that is why he removed the words ‘White Terror era’ [in the adjusted high-school curriculum guidelines] and made remarks lacking in any human conscience,” Chen said.
Wang also urged an end to the Chinese Civil War and political infighting and to focus on peaceful unification of “China.”
“There are no heroes in a civil war. What is the big deal about Chinese people killing fellow Chinese? Real heroes should fight against foreign invaders,” he said.
“Therefore we should come together to build up China as a peaceful, free, equal rights, and neutral nation,” he said. “That is the unfinished business following the suffering of victims from the 228 and the White Terror period.”
The decisions of the ministry’s task force have led to controversy.
Critics have complained that Wang is not a historian and that the task force did not have one academic specializing in Taiwan history.
Wang yesterday vigorously defended the task force’s decisions.
"You tell those pan-green historians to come up with 100 questions, and let us see who is better at coming up with answers," he said.
He said history studies are divided into Taiwan’s history, Chinese history, world history and the history of civilizations.
"Although the history group on the task force only has two members, and their specialty is Chinese history, they still have a background in Taiwan’s history. Nobody can encompass the entire field of history," he said.
When asked why the task force removed the phrase "White Terror era" from the high-school civic and history curriculum guidelines, Wang said the change had been requested by high-school teachers.
"Teachers complained the section was too lengthy and too demanding for their students. We want to prevent high-school students from encountering discussions about the ’White Terror’ here, there and everywhere. It would cause them too much aggravation," he said.
This story has been amended since it was first published.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source