Taiwanese artists have raised concerns about a Beijing art gallery’s plans to open a branch in Taipei in April, even before the legislature has begun its review of the cross-strait service trade agreement signed last year.
Beijing-based Aura Gallery is setting up a branch, with registered capital of about NT$150 million (US$5.06 million), on Taipei’s Dunhua S Road.
The gallery decided to set up a branch in Taipei because of the strong purchasing power of the city’s residents and their appreciation of art, but it had no plans to shift its focus from Chinese contemporary art and photography or to represent Taiwanese artists, Taipei branch art director Huang Ya-chi (黃亞紀) said.
The average annual sales volume of Taipei’s art market is about NT$5 billion, according to Taiwan Art Gallery Association statistics.
The Beijing gallery’s scheduled entry has alarmed Taiwanese artists, who say they already have a hard time competing against their Chinese counterparts.
Taipei-based InSian Gallery director Ou Shih-hao (歐士豪) said China has given little credit to Taiwanese art and artists, as evidenced by the failure of the globally renowned Juming Museum to make the list of China’s top 50 art museums.
The museum in New Taipei City’s Jinshan District (金山) showcases the work of Ju Ming (朱銘), the nation’s best-known sculptor.
“Over the past two years, a number of Chinese investors have expressed an interest in renting warehouses in Taipei’s Huashan 1914 Creative Park and Songshan Cultural and Creative Park for exhibitions, but I never thought they would one day enter [Taiwan’s market],” Ou said.
Ou said he was deeply worried about what would happen to Taiwanese artists if the legislature ratifies the service trade accord. They could be left vulnerable to Chinese-funded galleries’ ill-intentioned efforts to stifle their vitality and creativity by turning them into “mama’s boys,” he said.
Taiwanese artist Huang Chia-liang (黃家良) said although he has staged two solo exhibitions and taken part in a number of joint ones, he still has a difficult time finding a gallery willing to represent him because of the apparent shift in the local art market in recent years to Chinese painters.
“It takes at least five years for young Taiwanese artists to be noticed... I am afraid the passage of the service trade agreement may bode ill for their dreams of becoming professional artists,” Huang said.
Chow Mei-li (周美里), the Taiwan Solidarity Union’s policy and publicity director, said that under the WTO framework, Taiwan’s retail sector has only been slightly open to China — as required by an executive order, which is still subject to repeal.
“However, if the service trade accord is ratified, there will be something of a ‘controlling spell’ on Taiwan. There is a good chance that after Chinese-funded galleries gain a foothold, they might join hands with other Chinese-funded companies to provide end-to-end tourism service … which could pose a serious challenge to local galleries,” Chow said.
National Taiwan University economics professor Kenneth Lin (林向愷) said the ratification of the service trade pact would allow deep-pocketed Chinese investors to monopolize Taiwan’s art market and help Beijing enforce its “united front” tactics in the cultural sector.
“Since every piece of artwork is irreplaceable, Chinese investors could easily drive local art galleries out of business by buying up their best collections and prohibiting Chinese artists from approaching them to show their work,” Lin said.