Oil and fuel supplies would put “significant constraints” on both China and Taiwan in case of an air war between the two countries, a new report published by the US Council on Foreign Relations said.
“Examining an air war scenario is especially significant because China would have to establish air superiority over Taiwan before any plausible amphibious invasion attempt,” the report said.
Modeling fuel requirements in a war between China and Taiwan has “inherent value” says the 16-page report because the dispute is one of the “few flash points” that could conceivably draw China into conflict with the US.
Written by Rosemary Kelanic, associate director of the Institute for Security and Conflict Studies at George Washington University, the report relies on a RAND Corp study predicting that China would devote 967 aircraft to a Taiwan air conflict, while Taiwan would deploy 317 aircraft.
China could fuel an air war against Taiwan indefinitely, but only at the cost of slashing civilian jet fuel consumption by as much as 75 percent, the report says.
And that would mean serious reductions in airfreight volumes, as well as in passenger travel, it says.
In a worst-case scenario in which Taiwan could not import petroleum, its demand would have to be met entirely by commercial and government stockpiles.
Sharply aware of its energy vulnerability, Taiwan mandates that the oil industry and government maintain strategic reserves to provide a solid emergency cushion, the report says.
“Taiwan could supply 100 percent of military needs and 100 percent of civilian needs for 152 days,” the report said.
It added that if China was to supply 100 percent of military and civilian needs, government stockpiles would run out in 16 days with total stockpiles being exhausted within 48 days.
To blunt economic disruption, China would probably ration civilian supplies to stretch them out as long as possible.
“A separate and perhaps decisive question is whether Chinese citizens would tolerate it,” the report said, adding that observers often argue that the political legitimacy of the Chinese regime hinges less on nationalism than on the nation’s rapid economic growth.
Although it is unclear how politically destabilizing large declines in prosperity could be, China’s leaders have an incentive to avoid getting stuck between “a military rock and a political hard place.”
The report concludes that military demand for petroleum products during a major conventional conflict is significantly larger than commonly assumed.
“Both China and Taiwan face a tighter wartime fuel supply situation than default assumptions about military consumption would suggest,” the report said.
“If Taiwan could protect its oil refineries and strategic reserves in a war with China, it could meet all of its military and civilian jet fuel needs in an air war for five months — about three times longer than China could,” the report estimated.
However, it says, the vulnerability of Taiwan’s oil facilities to attack potentially undermines this advantage.
“China could produce enough jet fuel indigenously to prosecute an air war with Taiwan indefinitely, but not without risking political consequences to the Communist Party,” the report said.
It says this finding casts a new light on China’s “going out” initiatives to secure petroleum through equity oil arrangements and closer ties with exporters like Saudi Arabia.
“If Beijing truly fears the prospects of a US naval blockade during a war with Taiwan, such efforts are likely to increase,” the report said.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source