Following criticism over its proposed changes to the Labor Pension Fund, which would see higher premium payments and lower payouts for private-sector workers, the Cabinet yesterday countered that the opposition’s proposal would place workers at a greater disadvantage.
In an interview with Hit FM radio early yesterday, Vice Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), the architect behind the Cabinet’s reform proposal, said that he was “shocked” at the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) proposal, which he said would “double the premium burden on workers compared with the Cabinet’s proposal.”
“Is that the DPP’s way of taking care of the working class?” Jiang asked.
Photo: Taipei Times
“I’ve read criticism in newspapers saying that our proposal would drive employees to death, but I was shocked when I saw the DPP’s proposal. Isn’t the DPP the one that’s trying to drive employees to death?” he asked.
Later, at a press conference at the Executive Yuan, Council of Labor Affairs Minister Pan Shih-wei (潘世偉) said the DPP’s proposal would put “the working class at a disadvantage, while giving capitalists a greater advantage.”
The Cabinet and the DPP on Wednesday unveiled their respective plans to reform the nation’s pension systems, which cover more than 10 million private-sector employees, military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers.
On labor pension reform, the Cabinet presented two proposals on the methods for calculating pension payments. However, premium payment would remain the same, with employers contributing 70 percent, the government 10 percent and employees 20 percent.
Under the DPP’s proposal, employers would be responsible for 60 percent of the insurance premiums and employees 40 percent, which the party said was “in line with international trends.”
Jiang cast doubt on the DPP’s formula, saying that exempting the government from the premium- sharing burden was “against the spirit of the pension scheme.”
The Labor Pension Fund is a social insurance, and therefore the government should be held to a certain level of responsibility to contribute to the premium; otherwise it would be commercial insurance, Jiang said.
Taking as an example an employee with an insured salary of NT$43,900, Jiang said that under the Cabinet’s proposal, the worker will have to contribute NT$1,712 per month to the fund when the premium rate rises to its highest level, at 19.5 percent, in 2036.
However, under the DPP’s proposal, the worker will have to pay NT$2,854 per month when the premium rate rises to its highest at 16.5 percent 30 years after the policy change. That is an additional NT$1,142 a month, or NT$13,704 a year, compared with the Cabinet’s proposal, he said.
“The DPP said our proposal would cut employees’ pension claims to a significant extent, but the DPP’s would impose a much heavier burden on employees,” he said.
Meanwhile, Pan said that the DPP’s proposal was designed “in favor of capitalists rather than employees.”
When the premium rate rises to 16.5 percent under the DPP’s proposal, companies will have to pay an extra NT$74.7 billion for their workers’ premiums, much lower than the NT$124.5 billion they would incur under the Cabinet’s proposed premium rate of 19.5 percent, Pan said.
DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) rebutted Jiang’s criticism of the ratio proposed by the DPP.
Su said Jiang “made negative comments without a complete understanding of the DPP’s proposal.”
The document released by the DPP shows that the party “recommended a 6:4 ratio to correspond to international trends,” adding that the ratios of various pension programs should be the same, but it would take “a dialogue between all involved parties to determine the final ratio,” Su said.
The DPP submitted the ratio after learning that the government was recommending a 5:5 ratio, which the DPP opposed, he said.
The government’s proposal would lower private-sector employees’ income replacement rate to between 30 and 40 percent, “which would leave workers with no choice but to commit suicide,” Su said.
Lin Wan-i (林萬億), executive director of the DPP’s think tank and the primary author of the proposal, reaffirmed that the party did not recommend a specific ratio and had always maintained that the ratio should be negotiated by all parties
On the government’s pension reform proposal, former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) told reporters that the core issues should be the income replacement rate for public employees and the 18 percent preferential interest rate, but the government failed to address the issues, especially in regards to the preferential treatment for government officials with high incomes.
DPP Legislator Lee Ying-yuan (李應元) said the government’s proposal was not likely to clear the legislature without major adjustments because it failed to meet people’s expectations.
The government’s proposal appears to favor current public-sector employees while cutting the benefits of private-sector workers and future government employees as former civil servants who retired before 1995 will not be not affected by the proposed changes, Lee said.
Under the current government proposal, annual retirement payment for civil servants would be almost twice of those for private sector employees, Lee said.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft