Sat, Jul 07, 2012 - Page 1 News List

KMT lawmakers want beef to be first

EXTRA SESSION:Legislator Wu Yu-sheng said the beef with ractopamine issue should be discussed before talks on the capital gains tax and four NCC nominees

By Shih Hsiu-chuan  /  Staff reporter

Consumers’ Foundation chairperson Joann Su yesterday urged the government to enforce its set of guidelines on the feed additive ractopamine to safeguard the public’s health.

Photo: Taipei Times

Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers yesterday suggested placing the US beef issue on top of the agenda for the legislature’s planned extra session, following the Codex Alimentarius Commission decision to allow certain levels of the livestock feed additive ractopamine in beef and pork.

However, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) urged the KMT government to maintain the ban on ractopamine residue in pork imports even if it decides to allow residues of the drug in imported beef products.

The commission voted 69-67 in Rome on Thursday that it was safe to allow certain levels of ractopamine in cattle and pork tissue, including muscle, livers and kidneys.

Before the commission’s decision, civic groups and opposition lawmakers were strongly opposed to easing Taiwan’s ban on imports of beef containing ractopamine residue. However, since the commission’s vote, a softening of that stance with regard to beef has become apparent.

DPP Legislator Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃) told a press conference yesterday that in their hearts, DPP lawmakers still support a zero-tolerance policy on ractopamine, but faced with international reality, they would have to revise their stance.

“If the party cannot protect the public’s health 100 percent, at least we should protect it 90 percent,” she said.

DPP Legislator Tien Chiu-chin (田秋堇) said a law should be passed to allow for separate permits for the import of beef and pork — a proposal that was put forward by the government earlier.

Chen also asked the Department of Health to promise that if any member of the public later suffered a health issue as a result of consuming US beef containing ractopamine residue, the department would demand compensation from the US on behalf of the victim or victims.

Meanwhile, People First Party caucus whip Thomas Lee (李桐豪) said that Taiwan must forsake its zero-tolerance policy on ractopamine since the commission has now set standards.

However, his party demanded the government conduct health risk assessment of Taiwanese before it follows the Codex Alimentarius standards, he said.

KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) suggested placing the US beef issue on top of the agenda in the extra session, ahead of issues relating to a capital gains tax on securities transactions and a confirmation vote on four National Communication Commission (NCC) nominees, which are both controversial.

KMT Legislator Yang Li-huan (楊麗環), on the other hand, insisted that the Executive Yuan go ahead and ease the ban on ractopamine residue in beef imports via an executive order, because it is already within its mandate.

After the Codex Alimentarius Commission’s vote to allow certain levels of ractopamine in meat, Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) called a meeting of the Cabinet, which issued a seven-point statement.

Chen said the government would set allowable levels of ractopamine residue in imported beef by using Codex standards as a reference, while also taking into account local dietary habits, adding that the policy on ractopamine would address the needs of the nation.

The government will adhere to its “four principles” in replacing the zero-tolerance rule on ractopamine: Determine the maximum residue limits (MRLs) for ractopamine in beef imports, differentiate between the safety standards for beef and pork products, require mandatory labeling of beef products and to maintain the ban on imports of beef offal from the US, Chen said.

This story has been viewed 4062 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top