Soon after assuming office in 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) established a “military confidence-building mechanism” (CBM) task force at the suggestion of then-National Security Council (NSC) secretary-general Su Chi (蘇起), a body that continues to function to this day, a source said.
From its inception, the task force was reportedly headed by Lieutenant General Lee Hsiang-chou (李翔宙), then-deputy dean of National Defense University (NDU), with Major General Tsao Hsiung-yuan (曹雄源), then the head of the school’s Graduate Institute of Strategic Studies, acting as deputy, said the source, who is affiliated with the Ministry of National Defense.
The task force was reportedly charged with evaluating and fleshing out a framework for Taiwan to establish military CBMs with China.
The Chinese-language United Evening News reported in August that Lee Hsiang-chou was highly trusted by the ministry and had been assigned to conduct research on certain “highly sensitive” national security issues, including a CBM with China.
The reports said Minister of National Defense Kao Hua-chu (高華柱) had specifically requested that Lee Hsiang-chou, who represented the ministry in communications with the NSC, apprise himself of developments on the CBM issue.
The source claimed the ministry had been kept at arm’s length regarding the activities of the task force, which he added was operating in a manner that lacked transparency.
The administrations of former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) both actively sought to develop CBMs with China. Those efforts, which involved task forces, conferences and studies, began in the late 1990s.
However, some fear that under Ma, a CBM with China could be signed under a “one China” framework rather than as an international or state-to-state agreement, which would have implications for Taiwan’s sovereignty.
China’s 2010 Defense White Paper states that it regards any future CBM with Taiwan as a domestic matter, thus differentiating its scope and legal framework from similar deals with other states in the region.
Writing in Defense Security Brief in July, Alexander Huang (黃介正), professor at the Graduate Institute of International Affairs at Tamkang University, said: “China’s concept of building cross-strait ‘military trust’ is not a series of engagements between the two militaries, aiming at conflict prevention. Rather, it is a combination of political and security engineering process [sic] to reunify China under Beijing’s terms.”
So far, the Ma administration maintains that the time is not ripe to strike a CBM deal with China, given the complexity of the political situation.
The task force is not believed to have made official contact with any counterpart on the Chinese side.
Coincidentally, Lee Hsiang-chou and Tsao’s careers in the military have seen considerable success since the creation of the alleged task force.
Lee, whom a US-based academic described as a “very sharp, capable and professional officer,” started his career as director of former president Lee’s bodyguard unit and had once been seen as “pan-green” in his political inclinations.
However, since the task force was established, Lee Hsiang-chou gained the attention of both Su and Ma and was subsequently transferred to the position of Military Police commander in June 2009, though his rank was unchanged, the source said.
In May, Lee Hsiang-chou was promoted to Deputy Chief of the General Staff and made a general and Commander in Chief of the Army.
Tsao, despite being brought up on charges during his tenure as head of the Graduate Institute of Strategic Studies for violating academic ethics and given two demerits for the incident, was still promoted to a position in the NDU’s Management College in July this year.
The task force allegedly remains in operation to this day and has retained its original organizational structure, the source said.
Contacted for comment, Su denied such a task force existed and said he did not know Tsao. Speaking on behalf of the council, a Presidential Office spokesman also denied the claim.
“It is the council’s responsibility to collect information and conduct assessment on issues related to national security,” the spokesperson said. “However, no task force on a mutual trust mechanism for cross-strait military affairs was set up under the council.”
Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添), who sometimes participates at security council meetings, also said he had not heard of the task force.
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Chairman Kao Charng (高長), Government Information Office Minister Philip Yang (楊永明) and National Chengchi University professor Chen Teh-sheng (陳德昇), who were security council members early in the Ma administration, all said they had no knowledge of the task force. Deputy Minister of National Defense Andrew Yang (楊念祖) also denied any knowledge of the group.
Ministry spokesman David Lo (羅紹和) declined to comment on whether the task force existed.
Lo said that establishing a CBM with China was a matter of core national security and was therefore at the national level, adding that the military would follow government policy.
On establishing a CBM with China or other military issues, the ministry does not have plans to exchange or negotiate with its counterparts in China, he said.
As for a peace accord with China, which Ma proposed could be signed in 10 years if the conditions are ripe, Lo said this was a political issue in which the ministry has no say.
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiu-chuan,Mo Yan-chih and Rich Chang
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source