Two former aides to former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) yesterday said they were not involved in wrongdoing as Chen’s embezzlement trial opened at the Taiwan High Court.
Former deputy secretary-general Ma Yung-cheng (馬永成) and former Presidential Office director Lin Teh-hsun (林德訓) said they followed precedents when handling the presidential “state affairs fund” and accused the court of not taking into consideration evidence and statements that helped build their case.
“I did not pocket one dollar of the [state affairs fund],” Ma said.
They were found guilty by the Taipei District Court of helping the former first couple embezzle money from public funds and were sentenced to 20 years and 16 years respectively, and stripped of their civil rights for 10 years and eight years respectively.
The former first family’s bookkeeper, Chen Chen-hui (陳鎮慧), said very little in court. She admitted to the charges against her, but said she wanted to appeal because if she had to return more than NT$100 million (US$3.1 million) in embezzled funds as the district court ruled, she and her family would lose everything they own.
The hearing began several hours after High Court judges ruled at midnight to keep Chen Shui-bian behind bars following a four-hour detention hearing on Thursday night.
Presiding Judge Teng Chen-chiu (鄧振球) listed several reasons for the court’s decision, saying that since Chen left office he has kept in frequent contact with people overseas and, as a former president, he knows more channels for fleeing the country than ordinary citizens. The judges also said that if he chose to escape, he would live comfortably off the funds he and his family had overseas.
The court said because Chen received a life sentence from the lower court, he was a flight risk and would likely hide his assets, so detaining Chen was a necessity as there was no suitable alternative.
Teng had previously ruled on Sept. 24 to keep the former president behind bars for another three months, citing the same reasons.
Chen and his attorneys then filed an appeal against the High Court’s ruling to the Supreme Court, which on Thursday sent the case back to the appeals court for a new hearing.
The Supreme Court said the High Court’s reasons for keeping Chen in detention did not adequately explain why this was necessary and questioned evidence supporting the High Court’s notion that Chen and his family had huge amounts of undisclosed cash and other assets hidden overseas.
The Supreme Court also questioned the High Court’s reasoning that Chen had more channels to flee the country because he was a former president. The Supreme Court asked the lower court to reconsider whether it was necessary to keep Chen detained, since as a former president, he was under 24-hour surveillance by between eight to 12 National Security Council bodyguards.
At the beginning of the hearing, Chen kept his answers brief and let his lawyers do most of the talking. However, toward the end, he spoke for 40 minutes.
Chen said if he had wanted to escape, he “would have done it a long time ago,” but in order to prove he has no intention of leaving the country, he requested that the court inform foreign affairs authorities to void his passport.
He was emphatic when talking about his family’s offshore funds, which he said Swiss authorities had frozen.
RSS