US President George W. Bush on Monday defended pre-war US intelligence on Iraq's alleged weapons as "darn good," amid charges that he inflated the nuclear threat posed by former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein in a key speech.
"The intelligence I get is darn good intelligence. And the speeches I have given were backed by good intelligence," said Bush, who has drawn fire over a sentence in his Jan. 28 State of the Union address to the nation.
The White House has since admitted that the evidence buttressing that line -- "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" -- was so flawed that it should not have been included in the speech.
In London, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said on Monday that Britain could not tell the US how it knew that Iraq tried to get uranium because the information originated from a third country.
His statement seemed likely to add to an embarrassing rift between London and Washington -- allies in the war to overthrow Saddam -- over the way intelligence was used in the run-up to the conflict.
The issue could cloud talks in Washington tomorrow when British Prime Minister Tony Blair meets with Bush and makes a special address to Congress.
Straw, speaking on BBC radio, stood by Britain's claim, which was contained in a controversial 50-page dossier on Saddam's pursuit of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons issued last September.
"We believe in the intelligence which was behind the claims made in the September 24 dossier, yes," he said on a current affairs program when asked if the intelligence on Niger was still valid in the eyes of the British government.
France and Italy both issued swift denials that their intelligence services were the origins of the contested claim about Niger.
Blair was Bush's staunchest ally on Iraq, but since combat was declared over on May 1, US and British forces have yet to unearth hard proof of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction -- let alone the man himself.
As well as souring relations across the Atlantic, the confusion over Iraq's weapons programs has boosted the confidence of opposition Democrats in the US.
But Bush maintained that the war was justified.
"I am absolutely convinced today, like I was convinced when I gave the speeches, that Saddam Hussein developed a program of weapons of mass destruction, and that our country made the right decision," Bush said.
"The speech that I gave was cleared by the CIA," he said. "Subsequent to the speech, the CIA had some doubts."
If the agency had expressed those worries, "I wouldn't have put it in the speech," said the president.
In a surprise statement Friday, CIA Director George Tenet took responsibility for the inclusion of the disputed allegation.
Tenet's statement echoed what the White House had been saying for the past week -- that Bush made the claim in good faith after the information had been cleared by intelligence agencies.
On Monday, Bush received his regular daily intelligence briefing from Tenet -- their first face-to-face since the controversy erupted early last week.
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said he did not know whether they had discussed the matter, but told reporters, "I assure you the president is not pleased" with the failure to remove the flawed accusation.
But Fleischer also tore into critics who have suggested that the administration knowingly exaggerated the threat posed by Iraq.
"This revisionist notion that somehow this is now the core of why we went to war, a central issue in why we went to war, a fundamental underpinning of the president's decisions, is a bunch of bull," he said.
"As far as the president is concerned, he's moved on. I think the bottom has been gotten to," he said.
Also see stories:
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft