Mon, Jul 07, 2003 News Editorials 485938527 visits
 Photo News
 More Front Page
 More IELTS
 Johnny Neihu
  • Back Issue

  •   << >>   Full List

  • TaipeiTimes
  •   Subscribe
  •   Advertise
  •   Employment
  •   FAQ
  •   About Us
  •   Contact Us
  •   Copyright
  • Search Most Read Story Most Viewed Photo
     Print
     Mail
     wiki links

    After 1,000 days of fighting, issues far from resolved

    ISRAELIS AND PALESTINIANS: Small achievements on the road to a peaceful coexistence have been overshadowed by the continued loss of life on both sides

    AP, JERUSALEM
    Monday, Jul 07, 2003, Page 1

    Surveying the wreckage of the Middle East's last big push for peace in January 2001, Israel's then-prime minister Ehud Barak said something that turned out to be prophetic:

    "In a few years, we will bury our hundreds of dead and they will bury their thousands of dead, and we will go back to the negotiating table, and we will face the same issues."

    After about 1,000 days of fighting, 2,416 are dead on the Palestinian side, 807 on the Israeli side, and the issues are no closer to resolution. If there is any hope at all, it is for an end to the current round of fighting and a deepening recognition on both sides that neither can get everything it wants.

    The "road map" to peace pushed by the Bush administration has yielded its first concrete results. Palestinian militants agreed to suspend attacks, Israeli troops began easing their hold on Palestinians, and leaders of both sides shared a platform in a startling display of bonhomie.

    Nael Qassem, a Palestinian engineer in the Gaza Strip, was able to commute to work in 25 minutes last week, instead of spending hours getting through Israeli checkpoints. In Tel Aviv, economist Eli Palotinsky took heart from a stock market that has anticipated US President George W. Bush's intervention by shooting up 40 percent in recent months.

    The road map has broad international backing, including for the first time by the Arab world, which contributed to the collapse of the 2001 talks by staying on the sidelines. Also, Iraq, perhaps Israel's most formidable foe under former president Saddam Hussein, has been neutralized, and US clout in the region is at a high as a result.

    What hope there is for this latest effort comes with strong doses of dread and skepticism. But even though Israel's army chief and Hamas each claimed victory, more Israelis and Palestinians are now persuaded that there is no winner and that they must divide the land between them.

    The intifada has made many Israelis realize that hanging on to the West Bank and Gaza Strip comes with a high price -- terror and recession -- and that giving the Palestinians independence is not an act of generosity, but the key to Israel's survival as a Jewish state.

    Barak had offered such a state already three years ago, but with little domestic support. Now, most Israelis would happily settle for such a deal, if they could be convinced their security was assured.

    The Palestinians emerged with a sense of national dignity; they had pushed a far more powerful opponent as hard as they could. But Israel didn't break, making many Palestinians realize they will have to make concessions -- for example, by giving up the demand that their refugee brethren be allowed to reclaim homes they abandoned or lost when Israel became a state in 1948.

    After 33 months of attack and counterattack, the Palestinian militants blinked first, calling a unilateral truce. But Israel -- unable to stop the suicide bombings despite massive military campaigns -- has also discovered the limits of force.

    The Palestinians have won unprecedented international backing for their claim to statehood, along with a detailed US plan on how to establish it within two years, but they now face Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, from whom they will likely get less than Barak offered.

    Both sides seem eager for a break, if not an end, to the fighting.

    "There is optimism that something has ended," said Eran Lehrman, a former military intelligence officer. "It seems the process has played itself out."

    Palestinian pollster Khalil Shekaki, who measured strong support for the three-month ceasefire declared last weekend by Islamic militants, said that "the public on both sides wants to take a time-out."

    The break in fighting has allowed both sides to take stock of what some Israelis -- in a subtle sign of hope -- are referring to in past tense as "The Thousand Day War."

    Horrific images linger: a young Palestinian gleefully raising bloodied palms after the lynching of two Israeli soldiers; rows of bodies covered by white sheets in a makeshift West Bank morgue; workers with a squeegee clearing blood from the floor of a hotel dining room after a suicide bomber killed 29 people during a Passover meal; a Palestinian boy screaming in panic as he huddled behind his father during crossfire that would kill him.

    There are many thousands like security guard Bilal Nassan in the West Bank town of Ramallah, who has seen 22 relatives caught up in Israeli sweeps, and Nitzan Dagan, a 33-year-old Tel Aviv man who avoids buses and restaurants as potential targets of bombers. Or Marco Elimeleh, a contractor from the Israeli coastal town of Ashkelon whose business has dried up; and Wael Bassyouni, 26, whose Gaza home was razed by Israeli bulldozers to deprive militants of cover.

    And it will take years to recover from the economic setbacks. The Palestinians have lost about US$5 billion, or a year's worth of income and 65 percent of Palestinians in Gaza are now poor, living on less than US$2 a day. Israel is mired in a recession. More than one in 10 are jobless and the economy has shrunk for two years running.

    For fear of more disappointment, few are celebrating today. And there's dread that if the latest peace plan, the US-backed "road map," fails, bloodshed will be worse.

    "Six months down the road, if we will not be able to move forward, it will be very dangerous," Shekaki said.

    Danger and deadlock lurk at every turn.

    Israel withdrew from Bethlehem last week but says it won't leave other West Bank towns until Palestinian security forces begin disarming the militants. Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas says he's not strong enough to use force.

    Without further withdrawals and the lifting of travel bans, the militants will claim justification for resuming bombings and shootings.

    In parallel, Sharon is required to freeze Jewish settlement construction and remove small outposts, a bitter pill for Israel's leading hard-liner and one that would also risk breaking up his coalition. Israel has removed nearly a dozen outposts, but settlement monitors say just as many have been put back up by settlers. Israel has freed about 200 Palestinian prisoners, out of more than 5,000, but those released including many whose sentences were up already.

    In a second phase, Israel would probably have to dismantle more than a dozen older settlements to make way for the Palestinian state, and Jewish hard-liners, who see the West Bank as Israel's biblical birthright, are sure to resist.

    And on the horizon lie more peace talks on issues that have proven unresolvable before -- the exact borders of a partition, how to share Jerusalem, the future of millions of displaced Palestinians.

    Was the battle worth it? More philosophical voices are starting to be heard.

    "The intifadda was a political message," said Palestinian economist Salah Abdel Shafi.

    But, he adds, "we could have delivered this message without all the suffering and loss."

    The suicide bombings hardened Israeli public opinion, he said, and "were very harmful to the Palestinian cause, on moral grounds and politically."

    While Israelis tend to see themselves as having withstood the onslaught and shown the Palestinians that they cannot be blasted out of their country, they have become more aware that the land must be shared, Lehrman said.
    This story has been viewed 1611 times.

  • Advertising