US President George W. Bush walked into a hail of protest yesterday after ditching the 1997 Kyoto treaty aimed at staving off global warning, with Pacific islands warning rising seas could wipe them off the map.
The EU said it was "very worried" by the US decision, Japan urged Washington to reconsider and Australia reminded the world's most voracious resources consumer it had a responsibility to cut the globe's emissions of greenhouse gases.
PHOTO: AP
In the Pacific Ocean, island states already suffering devastation because of rising sea levels and severe storms and droughts said their very survival was at stake.
"It is very worrying if it is true that the US intends to pull out of the protocol," EU Environment Commissioner Margot Wallstrom said in a statement. "The EU is willing to discuss details and problems -- but not scrap the whole protocol."
British Environment Minister Michael Meacher said in a BBC television interview the US decision was extremely serious.
"[Global warming] is the most dangerous and fearful challenge to humanity over the next 100 years," Meacher said.
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said on Wednesday President George W. Bush had been "unequivocal." "He does not support the Kyoto treaty. It is not in the United States' economic best interest," Fleischer said.
The UN pact was signed in the Japanese city of Kyoto by ex-president Bill Clinton and leaders of other industrialized countries, but it has not been ratified by the US Senate. Under the treaty, the major powers agreed to cut greenhouse gas emissions, which result mainly from burning coal and oil, by an average of 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.
Scientists believe that greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide, trap heat in the atmosphere and contribute to global warming, which can cause disastrous weather changes.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, bringing together research by around 2,000 scientists, said that this year the consequences could include big floods, long droughts and the extinction of countless species.
Fleischer said Bush opposed Kyoto because it does not bind developing nations to curb emissions and he believes the costs outweigh the benefits. Coming on top of a decision by Bush not to ask US power plants to cut emissions of carbon dioxide, Washington's stance on the Kyoto pact was seen by some as its kiss of death.
"The Kyoto protocol wouldn't work without the United States," Australian Environment Minister Robert Hill said. The country responsible for 30 percent of global greenhouse gases "cannot easily walk away from that responsibility," he said.
Among those most threatened by climate change are atolls in the Pacific. The tiny nation of Kiribati said it was already experiencing coastal erosion, droughts and severe storms as sea levels rose.
"It is a terrible economic problem, it is our very survival," said Baranika Etuati, acting director of the Department of Environment and Conservation in Kiribati.
Japan, the world's second largest economy, urged Bush to reconsider.
New Zealand said it shared the "grave concern and disappointment" of other countries.
Environmentalists wept and fumed. "It is a low point in world environment history," said Australian Greens Senator Bob Brown.
Greenpeace climate campaigner Angie Heffernan, based in the Fijian capital Suva, said Bush's decision was driven "by oil, coal and gas interests." "Greenpeace is disgusted and appalled at the United States," Heffernan said.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
BULLY TACTICS: Beijing has continued its incursions into Taiwan’s airspace even as Xi Jinping talked about Taiwan being part of the Chinese family and nation China should stop its coercion of Taiwan and respect mainstream public opinion in Taiwan about sovereignty if its expression of goodwill is genuine, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said yesterday. Ministry spokesman Jeff Liu (劉永健) made the comment in response to media queries about a meeting between former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) the previous day. Ma voiced support for the so-called “1992 consensus,” while Xi said that although the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have “different systems,” this does not change the fact that they are “part of the same country,” and that “external
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source