US lawmakers slammed the Clinton administration Tuesday for taking an overly accommodating stance toward Beijing, despite White House comments that China's threat to use force to unify with Taiwan was of "grave concern."
In a white paper released Monday, China for the first time explicitly stated that it would use military force against Taiwan if it "indefinitely delays reunification." Beijing's belligerence prompted strong reaction from Washington.
In testimony to the Senate on Tuesday, Stanley Roth, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, said the white paper was an attempt by Beijing to set the "one-China" framework of cross-strait dialogue before the election of Taiwan's new president next month.
"The white paper reveals the anxiety in China about the outcome of Taiwan's election. Therefore, China was indicating their concern that whoever it is, he had best stick to the `one-China' policy and come back to the table on cross-strait dialogue," Roth said.
The US, Roth said, is urging for restraint on both sides and calling for pragmatism to restart talks after the presidential election.
"What's been very striking to me has been the moderate degree of the cross-strait issues in the Taiwan election campaign," Roth told the Senate.
"We're at a moment where all three major candidates in Taiwan have been trying to emphasize pragmatic flexible positions that could get the two parties back to the negotiating table," he said.
Roth suggested that both sides move beyond the semantics of "one-country, two systems." He urged China to come up with a more pragmatic approach, also telling the Senate that Taiwan is not interested in the Hong Kong model for reunification.
On Capital Hill, US lawmakers slammed the Clinton administration for what they see as a weak response to China's threat.
Republican Representative Ben Gilman berated the adminis-tration's policy of constructive engagement with China.
Clinton's "policy of accommodation toward Beijing is providing to be ineffective and is destabilizing the region," Gilman said, adding that "a firmer stance toward Beijing is required."
Gilman, also the chairman of the House International Relations Committee visited Taiwan last August and is a staunch supporter of the Taiwan Security Enhancement Act (TSEA) which seeks to improve military ties between the US and Taiwan and provide congressional oversight of executive decisions on Taiwan's arms purchases.
Senator John Kerry, a Democrat from Massachusetts, said Beijing's statement is "unacceptable" and that the administration had the responsibility to make sure that China "does not misinterpret where we are ... in one way or other."
"They fired missiles in 1996 and they are firing rhetoric this time to intimidate Taiwan's voters," Kerry said.
Political analysts in Washington, meanwhile, said China's white paper would exacerbate the tension between the pro-detente White House and anti-China hardliners on Capital Hill.
The Feb. 23 Taiwan defense review chaired by Republican Senator Jesse Helms was postponed because the administration declined to send a witness and as well as a failure of bipartisan negotiations last Friday.
Congressional aides from the US House of Representatives' International Relations Committee speculated that the hearing may be delayed until after Taiwan's March 18 election.
RSS