An exhibition celebrating the storied history of an Indian members’ club in London opened on Wednesday, less than a year after the restaurant dodged being turned into a boutique hotel.
“A Home Away from Home,” organized by British conservation charity the National Trust, tapped into a “treasure trove” of history on the India Club which emerged in part thanks to recent efforts to save it from eviction.
The month-long exhibition tells the story of the restaurant and bar venue on the Strand in London’s West End, through the voices of those connected to it over its six decades.
Photo: AFP
“The history has always been there but the campaign unearthed it and brought it to the surface,” Phiroza Marker, the club’s manager, said during a preview tour.
“People want to tell their stories,” she added, noting that old customers and even relatives of those who helped establish the club came forward when it was threatened with closure.
In late July, the club was saved from developers who wanted to overhaul the building, which already has a budget hotel on its higher floors.
Photo: AFP
HEART OF THE DIASPORA
Now primarily just a restaurant, the India Club became the heart of the Indian diaspora in Britain after it was set up in 1951 by Krishna Menon, India’s first High Commissioner to Britain.
It moved to its current location sometime in the late ‘50s or early ‘60s and was an umbrella organization for groups serving the growing south Asian community in Britain.
Westminster Council rejected redevelopment plans last year following a high-profile campaign against them.
The campaign garnered the support of intellectuals, Anglo-Indian businessmen and lawmakers from both countries — as well as more than 26,000 petition signatories.
“We followed the campaign with a lot of interest,” said Laura Carderera, a creative program leader at the National Trust.
The charity is more associated with running historic buildings in rural Britain, but has ventured into new conservation projects like this over the past six years.
“We felt that this place told a really important chapter in British history, about migration,” Carderera added. “It also tells a really important story about London’s changing landscape — places like the India Club are becoming a rarity.”
THE WALLS CAN TALK
The oral history created by the trust, with the help of a bursary from the British Library, saw more than a dozen people interviewed, from the club founders’ children to former staff and longtime clientele.
In keeping with the nostalgic atmosphere of the venue — which has changed remarkably little over the decades — Carderera’s team bought old vinyl and cassette players on eBay to play the recordings.
Others are heard on vintage telephone handsets mounted on the walls.
“I was missing my home, my mum,” recounts Krishna Ghosh, a trained Indian classical dancer who arrived in London in 1966 and began rehearsing at the club, in one of the oral histories.
“I made a connection culturally with the India Club,” he said.
With a mandate to promote Indo-British friendship, the club built up a roster of regulars not from the Indian subcontinent — particularly journalists working on nearby Fleet Street and at a BBC building opposite.
“It was one of those places where you felt: this is home, this is part of things,” said Kieran Cooke, a BBC World Service journalist in the 1980s, in another oral exhibit.
In some of the non-audio elements featured, early 1970s clippings from the India Weekly newspaper serving the diaspora, adorn the walls.
Together with framed pictures, they show some of the dignitaries who have held meetings in the first floor lounge or dined at the restaurant above, including founding member Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first prime minister.
In his recollections, Cooke said: “The cliche is if only the walls could talk, but it’s very much like that there.”
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless