Like many of her peers, Liao Tsai-wei (廖采薇) only plans to vote in the referendums in support of same-sex marriage — and not for any candidates in the nine-in-one local elections.
“I’m not really familiar with the candidates,” the Nantou native and fourth-year college student says. “The same-sex marriage issue is a trendy topic among university students, and we’ll frequently discuss it. In fact, I’m not sure what the other referendum questions are about.”
However, when told that Nantou County Commissioner Lin Ming-chen (林明溱) has made anti-LGBT statements — “The fewer same-sex marriages in Nantou the better,” for example, or “homosexuality can be prevented” — Liao immediately expressed her distaste, and said that she would do more research.
Photo: Liu Chen-hui, Taipei Times
“I’ll take a look at the other candidates’ campaign promises and political ideals,” she says. “If they aren’t impressive, even if they didn’t make [anti-same sex marriage] remarks, I’m still not voting.”
With 10 hot-topic questions and a lowered referendum voting age of 18, many news outlets are reporting that general interest in the referendums is higher than in the elections. Political apathy or disappointment in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are the main reasons cited. A search on Professional Technology Temple (PTT), Taiwan’s largest online bulletin board system, yields numerous comments such as “I don’t want to vote for either blue or green candidates, they’re all garbage. I’m only voting in the referendums.”
Blue refers to political parties, such as the KMT, that want closer relations to China, if not outright unification; green are those political parties that view Taiwan as an independent country and generally promote policies that reflect that.
“I haven’t felt strongly about whoever has been elected in the past,” Liao says. “It doesn’t really affect my daily life.”
Liao’s apathy toward today’s nine-in-one elections is shared by many others. A handful of PTT commenters, however, are imploring people to pay attention to the local elections and get out and vote.
“I’ve been hearing that many people are voting in the referendums and not the elections,” writes a netizen with the username zxc6931. “Please don’t do that! If you vote for the referendums, that means the issue is important to you, right? But what if a candidate with opposing views gets elected? Do you still think that your issue has any hope of being taken seriously?”
When reached for comment, Central Election Committee deputy chairman Chen Chao-chien (陳朝建) said that voting is a basic right and he respects the decisions of the voters.
Louis Wei (魏嘉瑀), who has lived in Taipei for eight years but retains her household registration (戶籍) in Pingtung County, has a different reason for not voting: she feels that she is out of touch with the issues facing the county.
And like most people under 30 working in Taipei, Wei cannot afford to buy her own apartment and moves frequently, and so consequently doesn’t see the value in constantly changing her household registration, which is currently at her parents.
According to the most recent statistic released by the Directorate General of Budgeting and Statistic, by the end of 2012 there 4.8 million people didn’t live at the household where they are registered, an enormous number that clearly impacts electoral turnout — and one that could be solved by abolishing it.
“I just don’t think I should be deciding for the people who actually live there,” she says.
However, she is back in Pingtung today just to support marriage equality.
“I wouldn’t be going back if it weren’t for the referendums. I’m going to deal a blow to the [Alliance of Taiwan Religious Groups for the Protection of the Family (Family Alliance, 護家盟)] … groups that spread disinformation to oppose same-sex marriage.”
When asked what she would do if a Pingtung candidate openly opposes same-sex marriage, she replies that that’s more the reason not to vote.
“I surely won’t vote for that candidate, but I won’t vote for the opposing candidate just because of one issue,” she says.
Chen Wang-shi (陳罔市) doesn’t know where to go if she is forced to move. The 78-year-old Chen is an active “sea woman” (海女) in Taiwan’s easternmost fishing village of Makang (馬崗) in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮). When the waves are calm, she ventures out to forage for algae, oysters and other edible marine morsels. She lives alone in the village, as her children have moved to the cities for work, returning for weekends and festivals. “I cannot get used to living in Taipei, and I feel very uncomfortable if I don’t go out to the ocean to forage. I
Aug. 10 to Aug. 16 They called him the “No Problem Doctor” (沒關係醫生) because that’s what he always told his patients when they couldn’t pay up. Operating the only clinic in Changhua County’s Pusin Township (埔心) during the 1950s, Hsu Tsai-chih (許再枝) knew that life was difficult in his remote hometown. “They barely had enough to survive, so it was pointless to chase after them for the money,” an 81-year-old Hsu told the United Daily News in 2002. “I just went with the flow, some offered to pay me back years later but I had already forgotten
Your body is floating in a warm, blue bath, neither sinking nor rising. Sunlight shimmers on the white sand below as a sea turtle drifts by. You feel your heart beating slowly and a profound sense of calm floods your mind. The figures floating at the surface seem distant, as if from a different world. Down here, there is just you, your mind, your body, and the water. In this calm, timeless moment, you have glimpsed infinity... you are freediving. The next time you find yourself on Siaoliouciou (小琉球), or on Green Island (綠島), or at any number of popular snorkeling
A widely criticized peer-reviewed study that measured the attractiveness of women with endometriosis has been retracted from the medical journal Fertility and Sterility. The study, “Attractiveness of women with rectovaginal endometriosis: a case-control study,” was first published in 2013 and has been defended by the authors and the journal in the intervening years despite heavy criticism from doctors, other researchers and people with endometriosis for its ethical concerns and dubious justifications, with one advocate calling the study “heartbreaking” and “disgusting.” The study’s conclusion was: “Women with rectovaginal endometriosis were judged to be more attractive than those in the two control groups.